Galileo and prior philosophy

被引:12
作者
Atkinson, D [1 ]
Peijnenburg, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, NL-9718 CW Groningen, Netherlands
来源
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE | 2004年 / 35A卷 / 01期
关键词
Aristotle; Galileo; thought experiments; falling bodies;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsa.2003.12.006
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
Galileo claimed inconsistency in the Aristotelian dogma concerning failing bodies and stated that all bodies must fall at the same rate. However, there is an empirical situation where the speeds of falling bodies are proportional to their weights; and even in vacuo all bodies do not fall at the same rate under terrestrial conditions. The reason for the deficiency of Galileo's reasoning is analyzed, and various physical scenarios are described in which Aristotle's claim is closer to the truth than is Galileo's. The purpose is not to reinstate Aristotelian physics at the expense of Galileo and Newton, but rather to provide evidence in support of the verdict that empirical knowledge does not come from prior philosophy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 136
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1919, The Science of Mechanics
[2]  
Brown J. R., 2000, COMPANION PHILOS SCI
[3]  
Brown JamesR., 1991, LAB MIND THOUGHT EXP
[4]   GALILEO AND FALL OF ARISTOTLE - CASE OF HISTORICAL INJUSTICE [J].
CASPER, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1977, 45 (04) :325-330
[5]  
COOPER L, 1935, ARISTOTLE GALILEO TO
[6]  
Cushing J.T., 1998, Philosophical Concepts in Physics: The Historical Relation Between Philosophy and Scientific Theories
[7]  
Galilei G, 1954, DISCORSI DIMOSTRAZIO
[8]   Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment [J].
Gendler, TS .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1998, 49 (03) :397-424
[9]  
Landau L. D., 1986, Hydrodynamics, V6
[10]  
Mach E., 1976, Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry, P134