A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations With Personality Traits

被引:200
作者
Goreis, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Voracek, Martin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Appl Psychol Hlth Dev Enhancement & Interven, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Outpatient Unit Res Teaching & Practice, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Basic Psychol Res & Res Methods, Vienna, Austria
关键词
conspiracy beliefs; conspiracy theories; meta-analysis; systematic review; big five; personality traits; measurement; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PARANORMAL BELIEFS; ENDORSEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; SITUATIONS; INVENTORY; MENTALITY; EXPOSURE; IDEATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the last decade, the number of investigations of the beliefs in conspiracy theories has begun to increase in the fields of social, differential, and experimental psychology. A considerable number of variables have been suggested as predictors of conspiracy beliefs, amongst them personality factors such as low agreeableness (as disagreeableness is associated with suspicion and antagonism) and high openness to experience (due to its positive association to seek out unusual and novel ideas). The association between agreeableness, openness to experience and conspiracy beliefs remains unclear in the literature. The present study reviews the literature of psychological studies investigating conspiracy beliefs. Additionally, the association between Big Five personality factors and conspiracy beliefs is analyzed meta-analytically using random-effects models. Ninety-six studies were identified for the systematic review. A comprehensive account of predictors, consequences, operationalization, questionnaires, and most prominent conspiracy theories is presented. For meta-analysis, 74 effect sizes from 13 studies were extracted. The psychological literature on predictors of conspiracy beliefs can be divided in approaches either with a pathological (e.g., paranoia) or socio-political focus (e.g., perceived powerlessness). Generally, there is a lack of theoretical frameworks in this young area of research. Meta-analysis revealed that agreeableness, openness to experience, and the remaining Big Five personality factors were not significantly associated with conspiracy beliefs if effect sizes are aggregated. Considerable heterogeneity in designs and operationalization characterizes the field. This article provides an overview of instrumentation, study designs, and current state of knowledge in an effort toward advancement and consensus in the study of conspiracy beliefs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Aaronovitch D., 2009, Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History
[2]   Beliefs in conspiracies [J].
Abalakina-Paap, M ;
Stephan, WG ;
Craig, T ;
Gregory, WL .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 20 (03) :637-647
[3]  
Barlow D., 2009, Abnormal Psychology: An Integrative Approach, VFifth
[4]   Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation [J].
Barron, David ;
Morgan, Kevin ;
Towell, Tony ;
Altemeyer, Boris ;
Swami, Viren .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 70 :156-159
[5]  
Basham Lee., 2003, J SOC PHILOS, V34, P91, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-9833.00167, 10.1111/1467-9833.00167]
[6]  
Bogart LM, 2006, J NATL MED ASSOC, V98, P1144
[7]   Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories [J].
Brotherton, Robert ;
Eser, Silan .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 80 :1-5
[8]   Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy [J].
Brotherton, Robert ;
French, Christopher C. .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) :238-248
[9]   Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale [J].
Brotherton, Robert ;
French, Christopher C. ;
Pickering, Alan D. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
[10]   Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire [J].
Bruder, Martin ;
Haffke, Peter ;
Neave, Nick ;
Nouripanah, Nina ;
Imhoff, Roland .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4