Enhancement of a tuned mass damper for building structures using fuzzy logic

被引:19
作者
Edalath, Sanooj [1 ]
Kukreti, Anant R. [1 ]
Cohen, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
Fuzzy logic; semi-active control; tuned mass damper; vibration suppression of building structures; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1177/1077546312449034
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Over the past 10 years there has been a growing need to introduce closed-loop control technology for vibration suppression of buildings subject to wind or earthquake disturbances. This paper deals with the investigation of the effectiveness of a fuzzy logic based time variable damping tuned mass damper (TMD) on a building structure undergoing free and forced vibrations. The uniqueness of this approach is the application of a robust, nonlinear fuzzy based controller to emulate a time-optimal control strategy. Fuzzy logic based time variable damping is introduced into a semi-active TMD in order to enhance its performance in the vibration suppression of buildings. First, a single story structure for three different vibration suppression approaches is studied. The fuzzy logic based time variable damping TMD (fuzzy TMD) is compared to the baseline passive TMD as well as a conventional proportional-derivative (PD) controller. Forced vibration is introduced using a resonant harmonic sinusoidal excitation (i.e. same frequency as the fundamental frequency of the structure). Finally, the fuzzy TMD is compared to the baseline for the free vibration of a 15 story structure. For both structures studied, MATLAB (R) based simulation results show that the passive TMD and the PD, both constant gain approaches, provide similar results whereas the fuzzy TMD yields half the settling time. This effort clearly demonstrates the potential of a variable gain (damping) strategy for the vibration suppression of buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:1763 / 1772
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Ahmadi G., 1995, SCI IRAN, V2, P99
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Mechanical vibrations
[3]   Control of linear second-order systems by fuzzy logic-based algorithm [J].
Cohen, K ;
Weller, T ;
Asher, JZB .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2001, 24 (03) :494-501
[4]  
Cohen K, 1999, THESIS TECHNION IIT
[5]  
Connor JeromeJ., 2002, Introduction to Structural Motion Control, V1st
[6]   Fuzzy logic control of a non-linear structural system against earthquake induced vibration [J].
Guclu, Rahmi ;
Yazici, Hakan .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2007, 13 (11) :1535-1551
[7]  
Inman DJ., 1994, ENG VIBRATION
[8]  
Jaung JN, 1991, AIAA910983CP, P1796
[9]   FUZZY-LOGIC [J].
KOSKO, B ;
ISAKA, S .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1993, 269 (01) :76-81
[10]  
SHAHRUZ SM, 1991, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 30TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-3, P2324, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1991.261584