Behavioral and economic impact of a familial history of cancers

被引:5
作者
Eisinger, F
Tarpin, C
Huiart, L
Horsman, D
Rabayrol, L
Didelot, R
Julian-Reynier, C
Sobol, H
机构
[1] Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, INSERM, UMR 599, F-13009 Marseille, France
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[3] Cesame 13, Marseille, France
[4] INSERM, U379, Marseille, France
关键词
behaviors; costs; familial-history; risk-perception; screening;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-005-3143-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Misunderstanding of cancer screening recommendations or messages and confidence in the predictive value of positive familial history of disease may converge to stimulate an over-utilization of screening tests in oncology by patients who perceive themselves to be at high risk. Methods: A survey looking for predictors of the uptake of five cancer screening tests (mammography, colonoscopy, Fecal Occult Blood Test, upper digestive tract endoscopy and chest X-ray) was carried out on 4000 healthy adults (mean age 46.4 years). Findings: Based on the results of a multivariate analysis, the survey enlightens the existing relationships between familial history and increasing uptake of medical cancer screening tests, with OR ranging from 1.3 (IC 1.0-1.6) for chest X-ray to 3.0 (IC 2.1-4.1) for colonoscopy In France (60 million inhabitants), a conservative assessment of the annual net number of unhelpful screening tests attributable to positive family history of related cancer with chest X-ray and Upper digestive tract endoscopy lead to a figure of 7000 and 7800 tests respectively corresponding to a total annual cost of more than euro 7, million. Interpretation: Clearer messages about hereditary risks and transparency about the efficacy of screening tests are required in order to decrease over utilization of screening tests and their related costs.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 311
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Lung cancer screening: Recommendation statement [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, P ;
Homer, CJ ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 140 (09) :738-739
[2]   KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS, AND PRIOR SCREENING BEHAVIOR AMONG BLACKS AND WHITES REPORTING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER SCREENING [J].
DEMARKWAHNEFRIED, W ;
STRIGO, T ;
CATOE, K ;
CONAWAY, M ;
BRUNETTI, M ;
RIMER, BK ;
ROBERTSON, CN .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (03) :346-351
[3]  
Drossaert CCH, 1996, CANCER DETECT PREV, V20, P76
[4]   The family history - More important than ever [J].
Guttmacher, AE ;
Collins, FS ;
Carmona, RH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (22) :2333-2336
[5]  
Hosmer D. W., 1989, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES, DOI DOI 10.1097/00019514-200604000-00003
[6]   Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review [J].
Katapodi, MC ;
Lee, KA ;
Facione, NC ;
Dodd, MJ .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (04) :388-402
[7]  
Laplantine F., 1992, ANTHR MALADIE
[8]   What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review [J].
McCaul, KD ;
Branstetter, AD ;
Schroeder, DM ;
Glasgow, RE .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 15 (06) :423-429
[9]   ADHERENCE TO SCREENING EXAMINATIONS FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER DIAGNOSIS IN A 1ST-DEGREE RELATIVE [J].
RICHARDSON, JL ;
DANLEY, K ;
MONDRUS, GT ;
DEAPEN, D ;
MACK, T .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1995, 24 (02) :166-170
[10]   Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States [J].
Schwartz, LM ;
Woloshin, S ;
Fowler, FJ ;
Welch, HG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (01) :71-78