Narendra Modi's social media election campaign and India's delegative democracy

被引:3
作者
Rao, Shakuntala [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Plattsburgh, Dept Commun Studies, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
关键词
India; Narendra Modi; democracy; election; rhetoric; Twitter; Hindutva; HINDU NATIONALISM; COMMUNICATION; POLITICS; PARTY;
D O I
10.1080/10714421.2020.1829306
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper qualitatively analyzes tweets sent by India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and responses to the tweets in the month leading up to his May 2019 electoral win. Several dominant rhetorical themes emerged from the analysis of the data, including Modi as omnipresent and Modi as an advocate for democracy who encourages voters to vote. The dominant theme that emerged from his supporter's responses was Modi as a leader who supports Hindu nationalism orHindutva. Both Modi and his supporters presented him as a strong leader who could stand up to Islamic terrorism and one who would invest in national security and India's army. The author concludes that India's democracy, under Modi's leadership, is akin to what Argentinian political scientist Guillermo O'Donnell has termeddelegative democracy. Delegative democracy is marked by extreme individualism of the leader, majoritarian politics, and minimal emphasis on democratic institutional building. In both Modi's and his supporter's Twitter rhetoric, there was no commitment to inclusive representation within or strengthening of democratic institutions, and while allowing for effective contestation in the form of elections, there was no evidence of respecting India's traditional constitutional norms, such as secularism and respect for minority rights.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 241
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Reviving Democracy at Thailand's 2011 Election [J].
Phongpaichit, Pasuk ;
Baker, Chris .
ASIAN SURVEY, 2013, 53 (04) :607-628
[42]   After the Election: Surviving Bush's Democracy [J].
Denzin, Norman K. .
CULTURAL STUDIES-CRITICAL METHODOLOGIES, 2005, 5 (03) :273-275
[43]   SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYTICS USING SENTIMENT AND CONTENT ANALYSES ON THE 2018 MALAYSIA'S GENERAL ELECTION [J].
Balakrishnan, Vimala ;
Kaity, Mohammed ;
Rahim, Hajar Abdul ;
Ismail, Nazari .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (02) :171-183
[44]   An Analysis of the Great Power Strategy of India's Modi Government [J].
Wang Xiaowen .
Contemporary International Relations, 2017, (04) :102-125
[45]   Social Thought from the Global South: A Comparative-Historical View from Xi's China and Modi's India [J].
Schroeder, Ralph .
NEW GLOBAL STUDIES, 2023, 17 (03) :269-289
[46]   WHAT MODI'S THIRD TERM IN INDIA MEANS FOR SCIENCE [J].
Mallapaty, Smriti .
NATURE, 2024, 630 (8016) :275-276
[47]   The BJP's 2019 election campaign: not business as usual [J].
Jaffrelot, Christophe ;
Verniers, Gilles .
CONTEMPORARY SOUTH ASIA, 2020, 28 (02) :155-177
[48]   India's obsession with Kashmir: democracy, gender, (anti-)nationalism [J].
Kaul, Nitasha .
FEMINIST REVIEW, 2018, (119) :126-143
[49]   POLITICS, GENDER ISSUES AND MEDIA. AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN THE 2019 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTION CAMPAIGN [J].
Brancato, Giovanni ;
Stolfi, Melissa .
PERSPECTIVAS DE LA COMUNICACION, 2022, 15 (02) :187-215
[50]   Soft Power and Biopower: Narendra Modi’s “Double Discourse” Concerning Yoga for Climate Change and Self-Care [J].
Miller C.P. .
Journal of Dharma Studies, 2020, 3 (1) :93-106