Mechanical characteristics of the maxillary sinus Schneiderian membrane ex vivo

被引:18
作者
Insua, Angel [1 ,2 ]
Monje-Gil, Florencio [3 ]
Garcia-Caballero, Lucia [4 ]
Caballe-Serrano, Jordi [5 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [1 ]
Monje, Alberto [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Oral Med, Entrerrios S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
[3] Hosp Infanta Cristina, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Badajoz, Spain
[4] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Hlth Res Inst Santiago de Compostela IDIS, Med Surg Dent Res Grp OMEQUI, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Univ Bern, ZMK Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Periodontol, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Dental implants; Grafting; Bone; Alveolar ridge augmentation; Maxillary sinus floor augmentation; FLOOR ELEVATION PROCEDURES; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; AUGMENTATION; IMPLANTS; PERFORATION; THICKNESS; SURVIVAL; COMBINATION; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-017-2201-4
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
It has been speculated that certain Schneiderian membrane thickness (SMT) might be more prone to perforation. This investigation was aimed at studying the mechanical characteristics of the Schneiderian membrane under one- and two-dimensional tests and their correlation to the histological SMT in human samples. Sixteen Schneiderian membranes were collected from 11 cadaver heads treated with Thiel's embalming method. The samples were processed and analyzed clinically and histologically. One-dimensional maximum elongation until perforation and two-dimensional resistance to ball penetration were performed after the biopsy. Data was analyzed by using the Wilcoxon rank test and the Spearman's rank correlation. The histological SMT was 1.36 +/- 0.42 mm, whereas the clinical thickness was 0.27 +/- 0.21 mm, yielding statistical significance (p = 0.000). The resistance under ball penetration was 0.59 +/- 0.43 N and the mean maximum elongation in the one-dimension test 11.19 +/- 7.14 mm. Expressed in percentage, the mean stretch was 241.36 +/- 227.97% (range 31.5 up to 947%). A weak positive correlation was found between the ball penetration test and the SMT (r = 0.10, p = 0.711), while a weak negative correlation was found between stretching test and the SMT (r = -0.021, p = 0.94). Mechanical tests seem to indicate that SMT might not significantly predispose to Schneiderian membrane perforation. Hence, other anatomical and operator's factors should be considered of surpassing importance. Thinner SM might be more prone to perforation when detaching it from the maxillary sinus antrum; however, a thick membrane is not prevented to tear, as their resistance under elastic forces is not higher than thinner ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1139 / 1145
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Novel Technique to Repair Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforations During Sinus Lifting
    Hassani, Ali
    Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Kalantar
    Saadat, Sarang
    Moshiri, Roya
    Shahmirzadi, Solaleh
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (11) : E592 - E597
  • [32] Effect of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation on Sinus Membrane Thickness in Computed Tomography
    Pommer, Bernhard
    Dvorak, Gabriella
    Jesch, Philip
    Palmer, Richard M.
    Watzek, Georg
    Gahleitner, Andre
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 83 (05) : 551 - 556
  • [33] Ex vivo comparative study on three sinus lift tools for transcrestal detaching maxillary sinus mucosa
    Li, Yanfeng
    Hu, Pin
    Han, Yishi
    Fan, Jiadong
    Dong, Xinming
    Ren, Huan
    Yang, Chunhao
    Shi, Tingting
    Xia, Dong
    BIOENGINEERED, 2017, 8 (04) : 359 - 366
  • [34] The Schneiderian Membrane Contains Osteoprogenitor Cells: In Vivo and In Vitro Study
    Srouji, S.
    Kizhner, T.
    Ben David, D.
    Riminucci, M.
    Bianco, P.
    Livne, E.
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 84 (02) : 138 - 145
  • [35] Stiffness Regulates the Morphology, Adhesion, Proliferation, and Osteogenic Differentiation of Maxillary Schneiderian Sinus Membrane-Derived Stem Cells
    Liu, Yiping
    Wang, Jia
    Zhai, Peisong
    Ren, Sicong
    Wang, Zhanqi
    Peng, Peixuan
    Du, Liuyi
    Li, Lisha
    Zhang, Yidi
    Zhou, Yanmin
    STEM CELLS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [36] Incidence, Risk Factors, and Complications of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation in Sinus Lift Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Al-Dajani, Mahmoud
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (03) : 409 - 415
  • [37] Crestal approach for the repair of the Schneiderian membrane perforated during transalveolar sinus elevation
    Lee, B. A.
    Lee, S. B.
    Kim, Y. T.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2021, 13 (03) : 150 - 155
  • [38] Preliminary Approach for Open Lateral Window Technique for Successful Maxillary Sinus Augmentation in the Unrepairable Wide Perforation Area of Schneiderian Membrane
    Park, Won-Bae
    Crasto, Gazelle Jean
    Kang, Philip
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [39] Guided maxillary sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone versus graftless Schneiderian membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement: Randomized clinical trial
    Fouad, Waleed
    Osman, Ahmed
    Atef, Mohammed
    Hakam, Maha
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (03) : 424 - 433
  • [40] Effect of Maxillary Sinus Membrane Perforation on Implant Survival Rate: A Retrospective Study
    de Almeida Ferreira, Carlos Eduardo
    Martinelli, Carolina Borges
    Novaes, Arthur Belem, Jr.
    Pignaton, Tulio Bonna
    Guignone, Camila Coser
    Goncalves de Almeida, Adriana Luisa
    Saba-Chujfi, Eduardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (02) : 401 - 407