Retrospective validation of a new diagnostic criterion for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: can hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase be used as an alternative to washout with the aid of ancillary features?

被引:78
作者
Joo, Ijin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Jeong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Dong Ho [1 ,2 ]
Jeon, Ju Hyeon [4 ]
Han, Joon Koo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Mediplex Sejong Hosp, Dept Radiol, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
Carcinoma; hepatocellular; Magnetic resonance imaging; Liver; Practice guideline; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; DATA SYSTEM V2014; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; IMAGING DIAGNOSIS; LIVER-CANCER; LI-RADS; MANAGEMENT; CT; SOCIETY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-018-5727-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo validate new diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) using hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) as an alternative to washout in combination with ancillary features.MethodsThis retrospective study included 288 patients at high risk for HCC with 387 nodules (HCCs, n=292; non-HCCs, n=95) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) 1 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Imaging diagnoses of HCCs were made using different criteria: APHE plus hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP) (criterion 1), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or transitional phase (TP) (criterion 2), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or TP and/or HBP (criterion 3), and criterion 3 plus non-LR-1/2/M according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 considering ancillary features (criterion 4). Sensitivities and specificities of those criteria were compared using McNemar's test.ResultsAmong diagnostic criteria for HCCs, criteria 3 and 4 showed significantly higher sensitivities (93.8% and 92.5%, respectively) than criteria 1 and 2 (70.9% and 86.6%, respectively) (p values <0.001). The specificity of criterion 4 (87.4%) was shown to be significantly higher than that of criterion 3 (48.4%, p<0.001), albeit comparable to criterion 2 (86.3%, p>0.999) and significantly lower than criterion 1 (97.9%, p=0.002).ConclusionsIn the non-invasive diagnosis of HCCs on Gd-EOB-MRI, HBP hypointensity may be used as an alternative to washout enabling a highly sensitive diagnosis with little loss in specificity if it is used after excluding nodules considered to be benignities or non-HCC malignancies based on characteristic imaging features.Key Points center dot Gd-EOB-MRI enhancement and ancillary features can be used to diagnose HCC.center dot Exclusion of LR-1/2/M improves specificity when HBP hypointensity is used.
引用
收藏
页码:1724 / 1732
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal. Radiology
    Ahn, Jhii-Hyun
    An, Chansik
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Choi, Joon-Il
    Joo, Ijin
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Kim, Dae Jung
    Kim, Do Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Young Kon
    Lee, Chang-Hee
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Lee, Jeong Eun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Min Hee
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Lee, Won Jae
    Lee, Young Hwan
    Park, Flee Sun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Park, Yang Shin
    Shin, Sang Soo
    Yoon, Jeong Flee
    Yu, Eunsil
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (03) : 427 - 443
  • [2] Allen BC, 2018, AM J ROENTGENOL, P1, DOI [10.2214/AJR.17.18981, DOI 10.2214/AJR.17.18981:1-7]
  • [3] Added value of subtraction imaging in detecting arterial enhancement in small (&lt;3 cm) hepatic nodules on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in patients at high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
    An, Chansik
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Dowhan
    Kim, Yeo-Eun
    Chung, Woo-Suk
    Rhee, Hyungjin
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Ki Whang
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) : 924 - 930
  • [4] Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review
    Balogh, Julius
    Victor, David, III
    Asham, Emad H.
    Burroughs, Sherilyn Gordon
    Boktour, Maha
    Saharia, Ashish
    Li, Xian
    Ghobrial, R. Mark
    Monsour, Howard P., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2016, 3 : 41 - 53
  • [5] Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality
    Bertuccio, Paola
    Turati, Federica
    Carioli, Greta
    Rodriguez, Teresa
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Malvezzi, Matteo
    Negri, Eva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 67 (02) : 302 - 309
  • [6] Cerny M, 2018, RADIOLOGY, DOI [10.1148/radiol.2018171678, DOI 10.1148/RADIOL.2018171678:171678]
  • [7] Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Ningxin
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [8] CT and MR Imaging Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Part II. Extracellular Agents, Hepatobiliary Agents, and Ancillary Imaging Features
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Lee, Jeong-Min
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (01) : 30 - 50
  • [9] Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis: Differentiation from Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging and Dynamic CT
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Kim, So Yeon
    Park, So Hyun
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Kang Mo
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Yu, Eunsil
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (03) : 771 - 781
  • [10] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2014 With Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation of LI-RADS Category 4 and 5 Criteria
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, So Jung
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Pyo Nyun
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (08) : 483 - 490