Wheatgrass Germination and Seedling Growth under Osmotic Stress

被引:12
作者
Sheikh-Mohamadi, Mohamad-Hossein [1 ]
Etemadi, Nematollah [1 ]
Nikbakht, Ali [1 ]
Farajpour, Mostafa [2 ]
Arab, Mostafa [3 ,4 ]
Majidi, Mohammad Mahdi [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Hort, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Coll Abouraihan, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran, Coll Abouraihan, Dept Hort Sci, Tehran, Iran
[4] Isfahan Univ Technol, Coll Agr, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
关键词
STIPA-TENACISSIMA L; PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES; DROUGHT STRESS; CREEPING BENTGRASS; ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE; COLD STRATIFICATION; CRESTED WHEATGRASS; LIPID-PEROXIDATION; VEGETATIVE GROWTH; TRINEXAPAC-ETHYL;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2017.06.0364
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Osmotic stress is one of the major environmental stresses that limits plant growth and seed germination in many areas of the world. The purpose of this research was to determine the degree and range of tolerance to osmotic stress in 20 wheatgrass ecotypes to identify ecotypes that might be potentially useful in arid and semiarid regions. We used a completely randomized factorial design with two factors, five levels of osmotic stress (0, -0.2, -0.5, -0.8, and -1.6 MPa), wheatgrass ecotypes, and three replicates. Our findings suggest that AD1, AD2, AD3, and AD5 ecotypes under osmotic stress have a higher level of final germination percentage (FGP) and rate of germination (GR), although they had a lower value for the average germination time (MGT) than other ecotypes during the experiment. These results suggested that AD1, AD2, AD3, AD5, AE5, AC6, and FA ecotypes exhibited a more effective protection, along with various mechanisms, and the mitigation of oxidative damages such as lipid peroxidation through mechanisms by which enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activities were maintained at a higher level. Also, these ecotypes showed higher proline and total nonstructural carbohydrate contents (TNC), but lower malondialdehyde content (MDA) and H2O2 content than other ecotypes. A cluster analysis found these same six ecotypes (AD1, AD2, AD3, AD5, AE5, and AC6) and FA were clustered into a group of "osmotic-tolerant ecotypes". This group might be potentially useful in arid and semiarid regions.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 585
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Improved tolerance to post-anthesis drought stress by pre-drought priming at vegetative stages in drought-tolerant and -sensitive wheat cultivars [J].
Abid, Muhammad ;
Tian, Zhongwei ;
Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir ;
Liu, Yang ;
Cui, Yakun ;
Zahoor, Rizwan ;
Jiang, Dong ;
Dai, Tingbo .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 106 :218-227
[2]   Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants [J].
Alscher, RG ;
Erturk, N ;
Heath, LS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2002, 53 (372) :1331-1341
[3]   Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers [J].
Ashraf, M. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2009, 27 (01) :84-93
[4]  
Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) Tetrazolium Subcommittee, 2000, TETR TEST HDB
[5]   Physiological parameters of salt tolerance during germination and seedling growth of Sorghum bicolor cultivars of the same subtropical origin [J].
Bafeel, Sameera Omar .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (04) :300-304
[6]   RAPID DETERMINATION OF FREE PROLINE FOR WATER-STRESS STUDIES [J].
BATES, LS ;
WALDREN, RP ;
TEARE, ID .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1973, 39 (01) :205-207
[7]   Screening different crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertner.) accessions for drought stress tolerance [J].
Bayat, Hassan ;
Nemati, Hossein ;
Tehranifar, Ali ;
Gazanchian, Ali .
ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (06) :769-780
[8]  
Bewley JD, 1982, PHYSL BIOCH SEEDS RE, V2, P297
[9]  
Bhardwaj S., 2010, Botany Research Journal, V3, P1, DOI 10.3923/brj.2010.1.6
[10]   Variation in heat stress-induced antioxidant enzyme activities among three mulberry cultivars [J].
Chaitanya, KV ;
Sundar, D ;
Masilamani, S ;
Reddy, AR .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2002, 36 (02) :175-180