Suitability of the k-ω turbulence model for scramjet flowfield simulations

被引:30
作者
Chan, W. Y. K. [1 ]
Jacobs, P. A. [2 ]
Mee, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Ctr Hyperson, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Queensland Geothermal Energy Ctr Excellence, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
k-? turbulence model; hypersonic; supersonic; scramjet; CFD validation; SKIN-FRICTION; FLOWS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/fld.2699
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The suitability of Wilcox's 2006 k ? turbulence model for scramjet flowfield simulations is demonstrated by validation against five test cases that have flowfields representative of those to be expected in scramjets. The five test cases include a 2D flat plate, an axisymmetric cylinder, a backward-facing step, the mixing of a pair of coaxial jets and the interaction between a shock wave and turbulent boundary layer. A generally good agreement between the numerical and experimental results is obtained for all test cases. These tests reveal that despite the turbulence model's sensitivity to freestream turbulence properties, the numerically predicted skin friction agrees with experimental data and theoretical correlations to their degree of uncertainty. The tests also confirm the importance of using a y+ value of less than 1 in getting accurate surface heat transfer distributions. In the coaxial jets case, the importance of matching the turbulence intensities at the inflow plane in improving the predictions of the turbulent mixing phenomena is also shown. A review of guidelines with regard to the setting up of grids and specification of freestream turbulence properties for turbulent Reynolds-averaged NavierStokes CFD simulations is also included in this paper. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 514
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Second-order moment modeling of dispersed two-phase turbulence-Part 1: USM, k-ε-kp, and non-linear k-ε-kp two-phase turbulence models [J].
Zhou LiXing .
SCIENCE CHINA-PHYSICS MECHANICS & ASTRONOMY, 2011, 54 (06) :1098-1107
[22]   On the judicious use of the k-ε model, wall functions and adaptivity [J].
Lacasse, D ;
Turgeon, É ;
Pelletier, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2004, 43 (10) :925-938
[23]   Grid dependence of k-ε model for oscillatory boundary layers [J].
Ghumman, A. R. ;
Sana, A. ;
Tanaka, H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 162 (06) :371-377
[24]   Formatting Elliptic Model From SST k-ω Closure [J].
Rahman, M. M. ;
Li, Xinming ;
Hasan, K. ;
Lv, Ming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2021, 35 (04) :289-303
[25]   Comparison of k-ε models in gaseous release and dispersion simulations using the CFD code FLACS [J].
Moen, Alexander ;
Mauri, Lorenzo ;
Narasimhamurthy, Vagesh D. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 130 :306-316
[26]   Improved k-ω-γ model for hypersonic boundary layer transition prediction [J].
Zhou, L. ;
Yan, C. ;
Hao, Z. H. ;
Du, R. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2016, 94 :380-389
[27]   3D finite element modeling of free-surface flows with efficient k-ε turbulence model and non-hydrostatic pressure [J].
Leupi, C ;
Altinakar, MS .
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - ICCS 2005, PT 3, 2005, 3516 :33-40
[28]   VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF CFD UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS BASED ON SST K-ω MODEL [J].
Zhang Li ;
Chen Weimin ;
Chen Jianting ;
Zhou Chuanming .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2020, VOL 8, 2020,
[29]   Bayesian Model Calibration Using High-Fidelity Simulations of a Mach 8 Scramjet Isolator and Combustor [J].
Ullman, Michael ;
Raman, Venkat .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 195 (14) :3456-3474
[30]   Sensitivity of turbulent Schmidt number and turbulence model to simulations of jets in crossflow [J].
Valero, Daniel ;
Bung, Daniel B. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 82 :218-228