Suitability of the k-ω turbulence model for scramjet flowfield simulations

被引:30
作者
Chan, W. Y. K. [1 ]
Jacobs, P. A. [2 ]
Mee, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Ctr Hyperson, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Mech & Min Engn, Queensland Geothermal Energy Ctr Excellence, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
k-? turbulence model; hypersonic; supersonic; scramjet; CFD validation; SKIN-FRICTION; FLOWS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/fld.2699
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The suitability of Wilcox's 2006 k ? turbulence model for scramjet flowfield simulations is demonstrated by validation against five test cases that have flowfields representative of those to be expected in scramjets. The five test cases include a 2D flat plate, an axisymmetric cylinder, a backward-facing step, the mixing of a pair of coaxial jets and the interaction between a shock wave and turbulent boundary layer. A generally good agreement between the numerical and experimental results is obtained for all test cases. These tests reveal that despite the turbulence model's sensitivity to freestream turbulence properties, the numerically predicted skin friction agrees with experimental data and theoretical correlations to their degree of uncertainty. The tests also confirm the importance of using a y+ value of less than 1 in getting accurate surface heat transfer distributions. In the coaxial jets case, the importance of matching the turbulence intensities at the inflow plane in improving the predictions of the turbulent mixing phenomena is also shown. A review of guidelines with regard to the setting up of grids and specification of freestream turbulence properties for turbulent Reynolds-averaged NavierStokes CFD simulations is also included in this paper. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 514
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] Supersonic Boundary-Layer Combustion: Effects of Upstream Entropy and Shear-Layer Thickness
    Kirchhartz, Rainer M.
    Mee, David J.
    Stalker, Raymond J.
    Jacobs, Peter A.
    Smart, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2010, 26 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [22] Advances in CFD prediction of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions
    Knight, D
    Yan, H
    Panaras, AG
    Zheltovodov, A
    [J]. PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2003, 39 (2-3) : 121 - 184
  • [23] Kulkarni V., 2007, 26 INT S SHOCK WAV, V1, P565
  • [24] Advanced Computational-Fluid-Dynamics Techniques for Scramjet Combustion Simulation
    Ladeinde, Foluso
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (03) : 513 - 514
  • [25] Lu F. K., 1988, THESIS PENNSYLVANIA
  • [27] Gun tunnel flow calibration: defining input conditions for hypersonic flow computations
    Mallinson, SG
    Hillier, R
    Jackson, AP
    Kirk, DC
    Soltani, S
    Zanchetta, M
    [J]. SHOCK WAVES, 2000, 10 (05) : 313 - 322
  • [28] Experimentation, test, and evaluation requirements for future airbreathing hypersonic systems
    Marren, D
    Lewis, M
    Maurice, LQ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2001, 17 (06) : 1361 - 1365
  • [29] McDaniel JC, 1991, AIAA 3 INT AER PLAN
  • [30] Diagnostic modelling of an expansion tube operating condition
    McGilvray, M.
    Austin, J. M.
    Sharma, M.
    Jacobs, P. A.
    Morgan, R. G.
    [J]. SHOCK WAVES, 2009, 19 (01) : 59 - 66