Effect of Axial Acceleration on Drivetrain Responses in a Spar-Type Floating Wind Turbine

被引:29
作者
Nejad, Amir R. [1 ]
Bachynski, Erin E. [1 ]
Moan, Torgeir [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Marine Technol, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
来源
JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2019年 / 141卷 / 03期
关键词
FATIGUE DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1115/1.4041996
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Common industrial practice for designing floating wind turbines is to set an operational limit for the tower-top axial acceleration, normally in the range of 0.2-0.3 g, which is typically understood to be related to the safety of turbine components. This paper investigates the rationality of the tower-top acceleration limit by evaluating the correlation between acceleration and drivetrain responses. A 5-MW reference drivetrain is selected and modeled on a spar-type floating wind turbine in 320 m water depth. A range of environmental conditions are selected based on the long-term distribution of wind speed, significant wave height, and peak period from hindcast data for the Northern North Sea. For each condition, global analysis using an aero-hydro-servo-elastic tool is carried out for six one-hour realizations. The global analysis results provide useful information on their own-regarding the correlation between environmental condition and tower top acceleration, and the correlation between tower top acceleration and other responses of interest-which are used as input in a decoupled analysis approach. The load effects and motions from the global analysis are applied on a detailed drivetrain model in a multi-body system (MBS) analysis tool. The local responses on bearings are then obtained from MBS analysis and postprocessed for the correlation study. Although the maximum acceleration provides a good indication of the wave-induced loads, it is not seen to be a good predictor for significant fatigue damage on the main bearings in this case.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ISO: 281
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROC INT OFFSHORE PO
[3]  
Berger B., 2016, OPERATIONS MAINTENAN
[4]   Experimental observations of active blade pitch and generator control influence on floating wind turbine response [J].
Goupee, Andrew J. ;
Kimball, Richard W. ;
Dagher, Habib J. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 104 :9-19
[5]  
IEC, 2012, "IEC 61400-4:2012
[6]  
Jonkman J., 2009, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-38060, DOI DOI 10.2172/947422
[7]  
Jonkman J., 2010, OFFSHORE CODE COMP C
[8]   Time domain analysis procedures for fatigue assessment of a semi-submersible wind turbine [J].
Kvittem, Marit I. ;
Moan, Torgeir .
MARINE STRUCTURES, 2015, 40 :38-59
[9]   Joint Distribution of Environmental Condition at Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices [J].
Li, Lin ;
Gao, Zhen ;
Moan, Torgeir .
JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (03)
[10]   Correlation between Acceleration and Drivetrain Load Effects for Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines [J].
Nejad, Amir Rasekhi ;
Bachynski, Erin E. ;
Li, Lin ;
Moan, Torgeir .
13TH DEEP SEA OFFSHORE WIND R&D CONFERENCE, EERA DEEPWIND'2016, 2016, 94 :487-496