Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid-Naive Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

被引:82
作者
Steiner, Deborah J. [1 ]
Sitar, Steve [2 ]
Wen, Warren [1 ]
Sawyerr, Gosford [1 ]
Munera, Catherine [1 ]
Ripa, Steven R. [1 ]
Landau, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Pharma LP, Stamford, CT 06901 USA
[2] Orange Cty Clin Trials, Anaheim, CA USA
关键词
Buprenorphine; transdermal; randomized controlled trials; chronic low back pain; enrichment; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. Objectives. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naive patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Methods. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Results. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n = 257) or placebo (n 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. Conclusion. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;42:903-917. (C) 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 917
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREV TREATM MISS DAT, P3
[2]   Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Snow, Vincenza ;
Casey, Donald ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Owens, Douglas K. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :478-491
[3]   Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Fanciullo, Gilbert J. ;
Fine, Perry G. ;
Adler, Jeremy A. ;
Ballantyne, Jane C. ;
Davies, Pamela ;
Donovan, Marilee I. ;
Fishbain, David A. ;
Foley, Kathy M. ;
Fudin, Jeffrey ;
Gilson, Aaron M. ;
Kelter, Alexander ;
Mauskop, Alexander ;
O'Connor, Patrick G. ;
Passik, Steven D. ;
Pasternak, Gavril W. ;
Portenoy, Russell K. ;
Rich, Ben A. ;
Roberts, Richard G. ;
Todd, Knox H. ;
Miaskowski, Christine .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 10 (02) :113-130
[4]  
*CONS GEN COL OF F, 2009, BUPR CAT MED 2009, P2171
[5]   A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally [J].
Dagenais, Simon ;
Caro, Jaime ;
Haldeman, Scott .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (01) :8-20
[6]   Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ;
Beaton, Dorcas ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Farrar, John T. ;
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A. ;
Jensen, Mark P. ;
Kerns, Robert D. ;
Ader, Deborah N. ;
Brandenburg, Nancy ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Cella, David ;
Chandler, Julie ;
Cowan, Penny ;
Dimitrova, Rozalina ;
Dionne, Raymond ;
Hertz, Sharon ;
Jadad, Alejandro R. ;
Katz, Nathaniel P. ;
Kehlet, Henrik ;
Kramer, Lynn D. ;
Manning, Donald C. ;
McCormick, Cynthia ;
McDermott, Michael P. ;
McQuay, Henry J. ;
Patel, Sanjay ;
Porter, Linda ;
Quessy, Steve ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Rauschkolb, Christine ;
Revickl, Dennis A. ;
Rothman, Margaret ;
Schmader, Kenneth E. ;
Stacey, Brett R. ;
Stauffer, Joseph W. ;
Von Stein, Thorsten ;
White, Richard E. ;
Witter, James ;
Zavislc, Stojan .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (02) :105-121
[7]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[8]   Addressing Missing Data in Clinical Trials [J].
Fleming, Thomas R. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (02) :113-+
[9]  
Hays RD., 1992, Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach, P232
[10]  
HOLM S, 1979, SCAND J STAT, V6, P65