Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human

被引:80
作者
Alekseichuk, Ivan [1 ]
Mantell, Kathleen [1 ]
Shirinpour, Sina [1 ]
Opitz, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biomed Engn, Nils Hasselmo Hall,412 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Transcranial electric stimulation; Finite element modeling; Animal model; Neuromodulation; BRAIN-STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FIELD; TDCS; VARIABILITY; COIL; TMS; ORIENTATION; SIMULATION; FOCALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.044
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electric stimulation (TES) are increasingly popular methods to noninvasively affect brain activity. However, their mechanism of action and dose-response characteristics remain under active investigation. Translational studies in animals play a pivotal role in these efforts due to a larger neuroscientific toolset enabled by invasive recordings. In order to translate knowledge gained in animal studies to humans, it is crucial to generate comparable stimulation conditions with respect to the induced electric field in the brain. Here, we conduct a finite element method (FEM) modeling study of TMS and TES electric fields in a mouse, capuchin and macaque monkeys, and a human model. We systematically evaluate the induced electric fields and analyze their relationship to head and brain anatomy. We find that with increasing head size, TMS-induced electric field strength first increases and then decreases according to a two-term exponential function. TES-induced electric field strength strongly decreases from smaller to larger specimen with up to 100x fold differences across species. Our results can serve as a basis to compare and match stimulation parameters across studies in animals and humans.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 148
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Aberra A. S., 2018, BIORXIV, DOI [10.1101/506204, DOI 10.1101/506204]
[2]  
Alekseichuk I, 2016, BIORXIV, DOI [10.1101/340224, DOI 10.1101/340224]
[3]   Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: An MRI-volumetric study [J].
Allen, JS ;
Damasio, H ;
Grabowski, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2002, 118 (04) :341-358
[4]   Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines [J].
Antal, A. ;
Alekseichuk, I. ;
Bikson, M. ;
Brockmoeller, J. ;
Brunoni, A. R. ;
Chen, R. ;
Cohen, L. G. ;
Dowthwaite, G. ;
Ellrich, J. ;
Floeel, A. ;
Fregni, F. ;
George, M. S. ;
Hamilton, R. ;
Haueisen, J. ;
Herrmann, C. S. ;
Hummel, F. C. ;
Lefaucheur, J. P. ;
Liebetanz, D. ;
Loo, C. K. ;
McCaig, C. D. ;
Miniussi, C. ;
Miranda, P. C. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Nitsche, M. A. ;
Nowak, R. ;
Padberg, F. ;
Pascual-Leone, A. ;
Poppendieck, W. ;
Priori, A. ;
Rossi, S. ;
Rossini, P. M. ;
Rothwell, J. ;
Rueger, M. A. ;
Ruffini, G. ;
Schellhorn, K. ;
Siebner, H. R. ;
Ugawa, Y. ;
Wexler, A. ;
Ziemann, U. ;
Hallett, M. ;
Paulus, W. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (09) :1774-1809
[5]   Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields [J].
Aspart, Florian ;
Remme, Michiel W. H. ;
Obermayer, Klaus .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (05)
[6]   A lightweight approach to repairing digitized polygon meshes [J].
Attene, Marco .
VISUAL COMPUTER, 2010, 26 (11) :1393-1406
[7]   Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex [J].
Balslev, Daniela ;
Braet, Wouter ;
McAllister, Craig ;
Miall, R. Chris .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 162 (1-2) :309-313
[8]  
Barnes WL, 2014, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P6129, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945028
[9]  
Bernabei JM, 2014, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P406, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943614
[10]   OPTIMAL FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC ACTIVATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - EFFECTS OF COIL ORIENTATION, SHAPE OF THE INDUCED CURRENT PULSE, AND STIMULUS-INTENSITY [J].
BRASILNETO, JP ;
COHEN, LG ;
PANIZZA, M ;
NILSSON, J ;
ROTH, BJ ;
HALLETT, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 9 (01) :132-136