Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities

被引:158
|
作者
McRackan, Theodore R. [1 ]
Bauschard, Michael [1 ]
Hatch, Jonathan L. [1 ]
Franko-Tobin, Emily [1 ]
Droghini, H. Richard [1 ]
Nguyen, Shaun A. [1 ]
Dubno, Judy R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 135 Rutledge Ave,MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cochlear implant; quality of life; speech recognition; word recognition; outcomes research; HEARING HANDICAP INVENTORY; POSTLINGUALLY DEAF ADULTS; BENEFIT; PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; TINNITUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/lary.26738
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
ObjectivesDetermine the impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life (QOL) and determine the correlation between QOL and speech recognition ability. Study DesignTwo authors independently searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to identify studies reporting hearing-specific or cochlear implant (CI)-specific QOL outcomes before and after cochlear implantation, and studies reporting correlations between QOL and speech recognition after cochlear implantation. Data from the included articles were obtained independently by two authors. Standardized mean difference (SMD) for each measure and pooled effects were determined to assess improvement in QOL before and after cochlear implantation. ResultsFrom 14 articles with 679 CI patients who met the inclusion criteria, pooled analyses of all hearing-specific QOL measures revealed a very strong improvement in QOL after cochlear implantation (SMD=1.77). Subset analysis of CI-specific QOL measures also showed very strong improvement (SMD=1.69). Thirteen articles with 715 patients met the criteria to evaluate associations between QOL and speech recognition. Pooled analyses showed a low positive correlation between hearing-specific QOL and word recognition in quiet (r=0.213), sentence recognition in quiet (r=0.241), and sentence recognition in noise (r=0.238). Subset analysis of CI-specific QOL showed similarly low positive correlations with word recognition in quiet (r=0.213), word recognition in noise (r=0.241), and sentence recognition in noise (r=0.255). ConclusionsUsing hearing-specific and CI-specific measures of QOL, patients report significantly improved QOL after cochlear implantation. However, widely used clinical measures of speech recognition are poor predictors of patient-reported QOL with CIs. Laryngoscope, 128:982-990, 2018
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 990
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality-of-life benefit from cochlear implantation in the elderly
    Vermeire, K
    Brokx, JPL
    Wuyts, FL
    Cochet, E
    Hofkens, A
    Van de Heyning, PH
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (02) : 188 - 195
  • [22] Evaluation of quality of life in patients after cochlear implantation surgery in 2014-2017
    Czerniejewska-Wolska, Hanna
    Kalos, Magdalena
    Gawlowska, Maria Bratumila
    Sekula, Alicja
    Mickiewicz, Patrycja
    Wiskirska-Woznica, Bozena
    Karlik, Michal
    POLISH JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 73 (02): : 11 - 16
  • [23] Underinsurance in children is associated with worsened quality of life after cochlear implantation
    Dev, Apurva Nidgundi
    Nahas, Gabriel
    Pappas, Alyson
    Ambrose, Tracey
    Craun, Patricia
    Fustos, Emily
    Reilly, Brian K.
    Preciado, Diego
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 157
  • [24] Duration of deafness impacts auditory performance after cochlear implantation: A meta-analysis
    Bernhard, Nikolai
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Ventura, Eugenia Romo
    Uecker, Florian C.
    Olze, Heidi
    Knopke, Steffen
    Haensel, Toni
    Coordes, Annekatrin
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (02): : 291 - 301
  • [25] Quality of Life after Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: An Updated Comprehensive Cochlear Implant Questionnaire
    Nahm, Edmund A.
    Liberatos, Penny
    Shi, Qiuhu
    Lai, Erica
    Kim, Ana H.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 156 (02) : 334 - 340
  • [26] Cochlear Implantation in Meniere's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Villavisanis, Dillan F.
    Mavrommatis, Maria A.
    Berson, Elisa R.
    Bellaire, Christopher P.
    Rutland, John W.
    Fan, Caleb J.
    Wanna, George B.
    Cosetti, Maura K.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (08) : 1845 - 1854
  • [27] Auditory and speech outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Waardenburg syndrome: a meta-analysis
    Qin, Feng
    Guo, Siquan
    Yin, Xiuwen
    Lu, Xiaoyu
    Ma, Jing
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [28] Cochlear Implantation in Children with Auditory Neuropathy: Meta-Analysis
    Bernardes, Marina
    Costa, Claudiney
    Ramos, Hugo
    Almeida, Rodolfo
    Gobbo, Debora
    Carasek, Natalia
    Bahmad, Fayez
    Lamounier, Pauliana
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 29 (03) : 167 - 180
  • [29] Cochlear Implantation in Adults A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gaylor, James M.
    Raman, Gowri
    Chung, Mei
    Lee, Jounghee
    Rao, Madhumathi
    Lau, Joseph
    Poe, Dennis S.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2013, 139 (03) : 265 - 272
  • [30] Cognitive Functions in Adults Receiving Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Speech Recognition and Changes After Implantation
    Zhan, Kevin Y.
    Lewis, Jessica H.
    Vasil, Kara J.
    Tamati, Terrin N.
    Harris, Michael S.
    Pisoni, David B.
    Kronenberger, William G.
    Ray, Christin
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) : E322 - E329