Assessment of bone graft incorporation by 18 F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion

被引:18
作者
Brans, Boudewijn [1 ]
Weijers, Rene [2 ]
Halders, Serve [1 ]
Wierts, Roel [1 ]
Peters, Marloes [3 ]
Punt, Ilona [4 ]
Willems, Paul [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Maastricht, Dept Nucl Med, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Maastricht, Dept Radiol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Maastricht, Dept Orthoped Surg, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[5] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
F-fluoride; PET/CT; spinal fusion; lumbar spine; bone stress; subsidence;
D O I
10.1186/2191-219X-2-42
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a method that allows decompression of the spinal canal and nerve roots by laminectomy combined with fusion by means of intervertebral cages filled with bone graft and pedicle screw fixation. Conventional imaging techniques, such as plain radiography and computed tomography (CT), have limitations to assess bony fusion dynamics. Methods: In 16 PLIFs of 15 patients with persisting symptoms, positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT scans were made 60 min after intravenous administration of 156 to 263 MBq of (18) F-fluoride, including 1-mm sliced, high-dose, non-contrast-enhanced CT scanning. Maximal standard uptake values (SUVmax) of various regions were calculated and correlated with abnormalities on CT. Results: Subsidence of the cages into the vertebral endplates was the most frequently observed abnormality on CT (in 16 of 27 or 59% of evaluable endplates). Endplate SUVmax values were significantly higher for those patients with pronounced (p < 0.0001) or moderate (p < 0.013) subsidence as compared to those with no subsidence. Additionally, a significant correlation between vertebral and ipsilateral pedicle screw entrance SUVmax values (p < 0.009) was found, possibly indicating posterior transmission of increased bone stress. In our patient group, intercorporal fusion was seen on CT in 63% but showed no correlation to intercorporal SUVmax values. Conclusions: With the use of (18) F-fluoride PET/CT, intervertebral cage subsidence appeared to be a prominent finding in this patient group with persisting symptoms, and highly correlating with the degree of PET hyperactivity at the vertebral endplates and pedicle screw entry points. Further study using (18) F-fluoride PET/CT should specifically assess the role of metabolically active subsidence in a prospective patient group, to address its role in nonunion and as a cause of persisting pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].
Brantigan, JW ;
Steffee, AD ;
Lewis, ML ;
Quinn, LM ;
Persenaire, JM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446
[2]   Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages [J].
Choi, JY ;
Sung, KH .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (01) :16-22
[3]   The Role of Bone SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Fusion With Metallic Fixation Devices [J].
Damgaard, Morten ;
Nimb, Lars ;
Madsen, Jan L. .
CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 35 (04) :234-236
[4]  
EVANS JH, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P38
[5]   18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography [J].
Even-Sapir, Einat ;
Mishani, Eyal ;
Flusser, Gideon ;
Metser, Ur .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 37 (06) :462-469
[6]  
EVENSAPIR E, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P416
[7]   Assessment of successful incorporation of cages after cervical or lumbar intercorporal fusion with [(18)F]fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography [J].
Fischer, Dorothee R. ;
Zweifel, K. ;
Treyer, V. ;
Hesselmann, R. ;
Johayem, A. ;
Stumpe, K. D. M. ;
von Schulthess, G. K. ;
Hany, T. F. ;
Strobel, K. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (04) :640-648
[8]   Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion [J].
Fogel, Guy R. ;
Toohey, John S. ;
Neidre, Arvo ;
Brantigan, John W. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (04) :570-577
[9]  
Fogel Guy R, 2009, J Surg Orthop Adv, V18, P77
[10]  
Gamie S, 2008, NUCL MED REV, V11, P17