Nonlinear prediction of conditional percentiles for Value-at-Risk

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, IJ [1 ]
Weigend, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Leonard N Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE/IAFE 1999 CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR FINANCIAL ENGINEERING | 1999年
关键词
conditional Value-at-Risk; non-normal returns; risk estimation; kernel percentile regression; neural networks; risk management; percentile prediction; nonlinear modeling; interval forecasting;
D O I
10.1109/CIFER.1999.771110
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We propose, implement and evaluate a new approach to predicting conditional distribution tail percentiles, which corresponds to Value-at-Risk (VaR) when applied to financial asset return series. Our approach differs from current methods for measuring VaR in two basic ways. Firstly, while the standard variance-covariance framework assumes that asset return distributions are normal, we make no assumptions about the shape of the entire distribution; instead we focus on estimating only the relevant percentile. Secondly, while the standard approach utilizes only the historical returns and covariances of the assets comprising the portfolio being measured, our method conditions on other additional relevant exogenous variables. We use the mean weighted absolute error function (MWAE), a generalization of the well-known mean absolute error (MAE) cost function. It is a familiar statistical property that the MAE is minimized at the median, or 50th percentile of the data; the generalization allows for estimation of arbitrary p-percentiles. There are two methods to estimating values from data: a lazy method keeps all of the data to compute the desired value at any given point; in contrast, an eager method uses the data to estimate a model which is used to generate the desired output. In this paper, we investigate two approaches for applying the MWAE to estimate tail percentiles in this paper, one using each method. The first, kernel percentile regression, is a lazy method, while the second, neural network percentile regression, is an eager method.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 134
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distributionally robust reinsurance with Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk
    Liu, Haiyan
    Mao, Tiantian
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 107 : 393 - 417
  • [2] Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics
    Chun, So Yeon
    Shapiro, Alexander
    Uryasev, Stan
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2012, 60 (04) : 739 - 756
  • [3] Bootstrapping Nonparametric Prediction Intervals for Conditional Value-at-Risk with Heteroscedasticity
    Torsen, Emmanuel
    Seknewna, Lema Logamou
    JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2019, 2019
  • [4] Kendall Conditional Value-at-Risk
    Durante, Fabrizio
    Gatto, Aurora
    Perrone, Elisa
    MATHEMATICAL AND STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ACTUARIAL SCIENCES AND FINANCE, MAF 2022, 2022, : 222 - 227
  • [5] Monte Carlo Methods for Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk: A Review
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Hu, Zhaolin
    Liu, Guangwu
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2014, 24 (04):
  • [6] Analytical method for computing stressed value-at-risk with conditional value-at-risk
    Hong, KiHoon
    JOURNAL OF RISK, 2017, 19 (03): : 85 - 106
  • [7] A SEQUENTIAL ELIMINATION APPROACH TO VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK SELECTION
    Hepworth, Adam J.
    Atkinson, Michael P.
    Szechtman, Roberto
    2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 2324 - 2335
  • [8] MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF VALUE-AT-RISK, CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK AND THEIR SENSITIVITIES
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Liu, Guangwu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2011, : 95 - 107
  • [9] A GENERAL FRAMEWORK OF IMPORTANCE SAMPLING FOR VALUE-AT-RISK AND CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK
    Sun, Lihua
    Hong, L. Jeff
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC 2009 ), VOL 1-4, 2009, : 415 - 422
  • [10] Nonlinear value-at-risk
    Britten-Jones, M
    Schaefer, SM
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND REGULATION IN BANKING, 1999, : 115 - 143