DOSE AS INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE IN EXPOSURE-SAFETY ANALYSIS USING COUNT MODELS

被引:5
作者
Wang, Jixian [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Adverse events; Confounding bias; Instrumental variable; PK/PD model; Poisson model; GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2011.559673
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Confounding bias often occurs in the analysis of the exposure-safety relationship due to confounding factors that have impacts on both drug exposure and safety outcomes. Instrumental variable (IV) methods have been widely used to eliminate or to reduce the bias in observational studies in, for example, epidemiology. Recently applications of IV methods can also be found in clinical trials to deal with problems such as treatment non-compliance. IV methods have rarely been used in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses in clinical trials, although in a randomized trial with multiple dose levels dose may be a powerful IV. We consider modeling the relationship between pharmacokinetics as a measure of drug exposure and risk of adverse events with Poisson regression models and dose as an IV. We show that although IV methods for nonlinear models are in general complex, simple approaches are available for the combination of Poisson regression models and routinely used dose-exposure models. We propose two simple methods that are intuitive and easy to implement. Both methods consist of two stages with the first stage fitting the dose-exposure model; then the fitted model is used in fitting the Poisson regression model in two different ways. The properties of the two methods are compared under several practical scenarios with simulation. A numerical example is used to illustrate an application of the methods.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 581
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Regression Analysis of Count Data
  • [3] Asymptotic results with generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data
    Balan, RM
    Schiopu-Kratina, I
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (02) : 522 - 541
  • [4] Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models
    Carter, RE
    Lipsitz, SR
    Tilley, BC
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2005, 6 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [5] Crowder M., 1986, ECONOMET THEOR, V2, P305, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0266466600011646
  • [6] Davison A. C., 2000, BOOTSTRAP METHODS TH
  • [7] *FOOD DRUG ADM, 2003, EXP RESP REL STUD DE
  • [8] An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists
    Greenland, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (04) : 722 - 729
  • [9] Ihaka R., 1996, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., V5, P299, DOI [10.2307/1390807, 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713]
  • [10] Use of instrumental variables in the analysis of generalized linear models in the presence of unmeasured confounding with applications to epidemiological research
    Johnston, K. M.
    Gustafson, P.
    Levy, A. R.
    Grootendorst, P.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (09) : 1539 - 1556