Corrective osteotomies using patient-specific 3D-printed guides: a critical appraisal

被引:17
|
作者
Rosseels, Wouter [1 ]
Herteleer, Michiel [2 ,3 ]
Sermon, An [2 ,4 ]
Nijs, Stefaan [2 ,4 ]
Hoekstra, Harm [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Fac Med, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Trauma Surg, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Dept Organ Syst, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[4] KU Leuven Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Malunion; 3D-guided osteotomy; Osteosynthesis;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-018-0903-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
IntroductionOver the last decade, the technique of 3D planning has found its way into trauma surgery. The use of this technique in corrective osteotomies for treatment of malunions provides the trauma surgeon with a powerful tool. However, this technique is not entirely straightforward. We aimed to define potential pitfalls of this technique and possible solutions to overcome these shortcomings.Materials and methodsTen patients with either a uni-, bi- or triplanar malunion of the long bones were included in this study. These patients were divided into three groups: a weight-bearing group and a non-weight-bearing group, the latter was divided into the humerus group and the forearm group, subsequently. 2D correction parameters were defined and compared within every group, as well as the interpretations of 3D visualization.ResultsThe weight-bearing group revealed an undercorrection for almost all clinical measurements of the femur and tibia, while there was adequate matching of the osteotomies and of screw entry points in all cases. In the humerus group, coronal correction angles were nearly perfect in all cases, while axial and sagittal correction rates, however, differed substantially. Screw entry points and osteotomies were all at the level as planned. The forearm group showed undercorrection in multiple planes while there were good matching entry points for the screw trajectories.DiscussionFour major pitfalls were encountered using the 3D printing technique: (1) careful examination of the planned guide positioning is mandatory, since suboptimal intra-operative guide positioning is most likely the main cause of the incomplete correction; (2) the use of pre-drilled screw holes do not guarantee adequate screw positioning; (3) translation of bone fragments over the osteotomy planes in case of an oblique osteotomy is a potential hazard; (4) the depth of the osteotomy is hard to estimate, potentially leading to extensive cartilage damage.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating mechanical benefit of wedge osteotomies in endoscopic surgery for sagittal synostosis using patient-specific 3D-printed models: Comment
    Hinpetch Daungsupawong
    Viroj Wiwanitkit
    Child's Nervous System, 2025, 41 (1)
  • [22] Patient-specific desktop 3D-printed guides for pelvic tumour resection surgery: a precision study on cadavers
    Garcia-Sevilla, Monica
    Mediavilla-Santos, Lydia
    Ruiz-Alba, Maria Teresa
    Perez-Mananes, Ruben
    Calvo-Haro, Jose Antonio
    Pascau, Javier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2021, 16 (03) : 397 - 406
  • [23] Patient-specific desktop 3D-printed guides for pelvic tumour resection surgery: a precision study on cadavers
    Mónica García-Sevilla
    Lydia Mediavilla-Santos
    María Teresa Ruiz-Alba
    Rubén Pérez-Mañanes
    José Antonio Calvo-Haro
    Javier Pascau
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2021, 16 : 397 - 406
  • [24] Patient-specific 3D-printed implants and templates for elbow and forearm
    Cramer, Christopher
    Sperlich, Samuel
    Haettich, Annika
    Dust, Tobias
    Frosch, Karl-Heinz
    Mader, Konrad
    UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2025,
  • [25] Patient-specific 3D-printed Splint for Mallet Finger Injury
    Zolfagharian, Ali
    Gregory, Timothy M.
    Bodaghi, Mahdi
    Gharaie, Saleh
    Fay, Pearse
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING, 2020, 6 (02) : 16 - 28
  • [26] Secondary Mandibular Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Implant
    Sharma, Neha
    Singh, Harsimran
    Goyal, Anish
    Malhotra, Mandeep Singh
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024, 23 (02): : 258 - 260
  • [27] Secondary Mandibular Reconstruction with Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Implant
    Neha Sharma
    Harsimran Singh
    Anish Goyal
    Mandeep Singh Malhotra
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2024, 23 : 258 - 260
  • [28] 3D-printed Patient-specific Spine Implants A Systematic Review
    Wallace, Nicholas
    Schaffer, Nathaniel E.
    Aleem, Ilyas S.
    Patel, Rakesh
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (10): : 400 - 407
  • [29] Accuracy evaluation of patient-specific 3D-printed aortic anatomy
    Kaschwich, Mark
    Horn, Marco
    Matthiensen, Sarah
    Stahlberg, Erik
    Behrendt, Christian-Alexander
    Matysiak, Florian
    Bouchagiar, Juljan
    Dell, Annika
    Ellebrecht, David
    Bayer, Andreas
    Kleemann, Markus
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2021, 234
  • [30] The Development of Novel 2-in-1 Patient-Specific, 3D-Printed Laminectomy Guides with Integrated Pedicle Screw Drill Guides
    Kanawati, Andrew
    Rodrigues Fernandes, Renan Jose
    Gee, Aaron
    Urquhart, Jennifer
    Siddiqi, Fawaz
    Gurr, Kevin
    Bailey, Christopher S.
    Rasoulinejad, Parham
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E821 - E827