Mifepristone by prescription: a dream in the United States but reality in Australia

被引:46
作者
Grossman, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Goldstone, Philip [3 ]
机构
[1] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Marie Stopes Int, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
MEDICAL ABORTION; PROVISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The requirement that mifepristone be dispensed only by physicians in offices, clinics or hospitals-and not by prescription in pharmacies-has likely limited uptake by providers in the United States. However, in several other countries, provision by prescription in pharmacies is allowed, including in Australia. Mifepristone was first registered in Australia in 2012, and in 2015, a composite package including 200 mg mifepristone and four tablets of misoprostol 200 mcg was registered. Both were approved as Schedule 4 medications, which require prescribing by a physician and may be dispensed at pharmacies. As part of the registration for both products, a risk management plan was instituted that has several components. First, physicians must be certified to prescribe mifepristone. General practitioners wishing to become certified must complete online training that includes prescribing requirements and managing the medical abortion process; obstetrician-gynecologists are exempt from the online learning module. Pharmacists must also be certified in order to dispense the medication, although this does not require additional training. When a pharmacist receives a prescription for mifepristone, she or he must confirm through a secure website that the prescriber is certified. In every region of the country, there are more certified prescribers and dispensers of mifepristone than the number of facilities providing abortion care. The experience in Australia demonstrates the feasibility of mifepristone by prescription and should be a model for expanding access to early medical abortion in the United States. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 189
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Obstet Gynecol, V123, P676, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444454.67279.7d
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, MS 2 STEL PI MS 2 ST
[3]   Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion A Systematic Review [J].
Chen, Melissa J. ;
Creinin, Mitchell D. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (01) :12-21
[4]  
Cleland K, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V121, P166, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182755763]
[5]   Medical liability insurance as a barrier to the provision of abortion services in family medicine [J].
Dehlendorf, Christine E. ;
Grumbach, Kevin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 98 (10) :1770-1774
[6]   Effect of Mifepristone on Abortion Access in the United States [J].
Finer, Lawrence B. ;
Wei, Junhow .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) :623-630
[7]   Obstacles to the Integration of Abortion Into Obstetrics and Gynecology Practice [J].
Freedman, Lori ;
Landy, Uta ;
Darney, Philip ;
Steinauer, Jody .
PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2010, 42 (03) :146-151
[8]   Effectiveness and Acceptability of Medical Abortion Provided Through Telemedicine [J].
Grossman, Daniel ;
Grindlay, Kate ;
Buchacker, Todd ;
Lane, Kathleen ;
Blanchard, Kelly .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (02) :296-303
[9]   Changes in Service Delivery Patterns After Introduction of Telemedicine Provision of Medical Abortion in Iowa [J].
Grossman, Daniel A. ;
Grindlay, Kate ;
Buchacker, Todd ;
Potter, Joseph E. ;
Schmertmann, Carl P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (01) :73-78
[10]   Women's perceptions on medical abortion [J].
Ho, Pak Chung .
CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 74 (01) :11-15