Examining methodological variation in response inhibition: The effects of outcome measures and task characteristics on age-related differences

被引:8
作者
Klenberg, Liisa [1 ]
Narhi, Vesa [1 ]
Korkman, Marit [1 ]
Hokkanen, Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Behav Sci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Inhibition; Executive functions; Ratio score; Development; Stroop task; School age; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; LATENT-VARIABLE ANALYSIS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; STROOP INTERFERENCE; DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; COGNITIVE CONTROL; METAANALYSIS; ADHD; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.1080/09297049.2014.950215
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study addressed methodological issues common to developmental studies on response inhibition. Age-related differences were investigated using two Stroop-like tasks with different levels of complexity and comparing different outcome measures in a sample of 340 children and adolescents aged 7-15 years. First, speed and accuracy of task performance were examined; the results showing that improvement in speed continued until age 13 in both the basic naming task and the two inhibition tasks. Improvement in accuracy was less consistent and continued until age 9 or 13 years. Second, two different algorithms were employed to control for the effects of basic processes in inhibition tasks. The difference algorithm indicated age-related differences similar to those for speed. The ratio algorithm, however, suggested earlier deceleration of development of response inhibition at 9 or 11 years of age. Factors related to the cognitive requirements and presented stimuli also had an effect on the results. The present findings shed light on the inconsistencies in the developmental studies of response inhibition and demonstrated that the selection of outcome measures and task characteristics are critical because they affect the way development is depicted.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 602
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, STROOP COLOR WORD TE
[2]   The influence of the parents' educational level on the development of executive functions [J].
Ardila, A ;
Rosselli, W ;
Matute, E ;
Guajardo, S .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 28 (01) :539-560
[3]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[4]   Stroop Effects in Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury: Selective Attention, Speed of Processing, or Color-Naming? A Meta-analysis [J].
Ben-David, Boaz M. ;
Nguyen, Linh L. T. ;
van Lieshout, Pascal H. H. M. .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 17 (02) :354-363
[5]  
Berlin L, 2002, J CLIN CHILD ADOLESC, V31, P242, DOI 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3102_09
[6]   A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function [J].
Best, John R. ;
Miller, Patricia H. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 81 (06) :1641-1660
[7]   Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13: A dimensional and developmental study [J].
Brocki, KC ;
Bohlin, G .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 (02) :571-593
[8]   Cognitive control in children - Stroop interference and suppression of word reading [J].
Bub, DN ;
Masson, MEJ ;
Lalonde, CE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (04) :351-357
[9]   Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children [J].
Carlson, SA .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 28 (02) :595-616
[10]   Inhibitory control across the life span [J].
Christ, SE ;
White, DA ;
Mandernach, T ;
Keys, BA .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (03) :653-669