Extra-target low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal high-intensity focused ultrasound of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Annoot, A. [1 ]
Olivier, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Valtille, P. [1 ]
Deken, V. [4 ]
Leroy, X. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Puech, P. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Villers, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Urol, Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] INSERM, U1189, ONCO THAI, F-59037 Lille, France
[4] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Dept Biostat, EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Pathol, Lille, France
[6] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Radiol, Lille, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Focal therapy; Index lesion; Secondary lesion; High-intensity focused ultrasound; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; INDEX LESION; THERAPY; ABLATION; OUTCOMES; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-018-2442-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyse the impact of the presence of extra-target non-clinically significant cancer (NCSC) after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation on oncological results. To analyse radical treatment free survival (RTFS) rates at 2-3years follow-up. Methods Retrospective single-centre study of 55 patients treated by primary HIFU hemiablation from 2010 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were unilateral MRI detected CSC, stage T2b, Gleason score (GS) 7, at least 6mm distant from prostate apex. MRI with systematic and targeted biopsies was performed at diagnosis. Follow-up included clinical examination, PSA every 6 month, MRI and biopsies at 1 year and in case of PSA elevation. HIFU retreatment was possible. Whole-gland treatment was indicated in case of positive biopsies with GS 7 or maximum cancer core length >5mm, any GS. Results Mean follow-up was 33 months (SD: 17-49 months). Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS at univariate analysis (p=0.29). 10 (18%) patients had a salvage whole-gland treatment after a median follow-up of 26 months (IQR 17-28). RTFS at 2 and 3years were 92% and 80%. Conclusion Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS. NCSC lesion can be left untreated and actively monitored. RTFS was 80% at 3years which support the concept of focal/partial treatment as a treatment option of CSC prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 268
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Results of low threshold to biopsy following high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer
    Haddad, Richard L.
    Hossack, Tania A.
    Woo, Henry H.
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2012, 4 (02) : 84 - 88
  • [42] Seven years of experience with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: Advantages and limitations
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han-Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    PROSTATE, 2012, 72 (13) : 1399 - 1406
  • [43] Transurethral resection of the prostate immediately after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Asakuma, Junichi
    Sato, Akinori
    Ito, Keiichi
    Nagakura, Kazuhiko
    Asano, Tomohiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (11) : 924 - 930
  • [44] Long-term outcomes of whole gland high-intensity focused ultrasound for localized prostate cancer
    Lo Verde, Kevin
    Toledano, Harry
    Campagna, Jennifer
    Rossi, Dominique
    Bastide, Cyrille
    Baboudjian, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (06) : 1233 - 1238
  • [45] Location of residual cancer after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Boutier, Romain
    Girouin, Nicolas
    Ben Cheikh, Alexandre
    Belot, Aurelien
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Gelet, Albert
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Rouviere, Olivier
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1776 - 1781
  • [46] Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Soleen Ghafoor
    Anton S. Becker
    Daniel Stocker
    Borna K. Barth
    Daniel Eberli
    Olivio F. Donati
    Hebert Alberto Vargas
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 3882 - 3895
  • [47] Salvage High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Recurrent Prostate Cancer after Radiotherapy
    Shoji, S.
    Nakano, M.
    Omata, T.
    Harano, Y.
    Nagata, Y.
    Usui, Y.
    Terachi, T.
    Uchida, T.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND, 2010, 1215 : 234 - +
  • [48] Assessment of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Obyn, C.
    Mambourg, F.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2009, 109 (05) : 581 - 586
  • [49] Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound vs. Active Surveillance for ISUP Grade 1 Prostate Cancer: Medium-Term Results of a Matched-Pair Comparison
    Marra, Giancarlo
    Soeterik, Timo
    Oreggia, Davide
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
    Moschini, Marco
    Stabile, Armando
    Filippini, Claudia
    van Melick, Harm H. E.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Gontero, Paolo
    Pasquali, Caio
    Macek, Petr
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2022, 20 (06) : 592 - +
  • [50] The Association of Tissue Change and Treatment Success During High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Khandwala, Yash S.
    Soerensen, Simon John Christoph
    Morisetty, Shravan
    Ghanouni, Pejman
    Fan, Richard E.
    Vesal, Sulaiman
    Rusu, Mirabela
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (04): : 584 - 591