Extra-target low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal high-intensity focused ultrasound of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Annoot, A. [1 ]
Olivier, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Valtille, P. [1 ]
Deken, V. [4 ]
Leroy, X. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Puech, P. [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Villers, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Urol, Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] INSERM, U1189, ONCO THAI, F-59037 Lille, France
[4] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Dept Biostat, EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Pathol, Lille, France
[6] Lille Univ, CHRU Lille, Dept Radiol, Lille, France
关键词
Prostate cancer; Focal therapy; Index lesion; Secondary lesion; High-intensity focused ultrasound; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; INDEX LESION; THERAPY; ABLATION; OUTCOMES; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-018-2442-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyse the impact of the presence of extra-target non-clinically significant cancer (NCSC) after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation on oncological results. To analyse radical treatment free survival (RTFS) rates at 2-3years follow-up. Methods Retrospective single-centre study of 55 patients treated by primary HIFU hemiablation from 2010 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were unilateral MRI detected CSC, stage T2b, Gleason score (GS) 7, at least 6mm distant from prostate apex. MRI with systematic and targeted biopsies was performed at diagnosis. Follow-up included clinical examination, PSA every 6 month, MRI and biopsies at 1 year and in case of PSA elevation. HIFU retreatment was possible. Whole-gland treatment was indicated in case of positive biopsies with GS 7 or maximum cancer core length >5mm, any GS. Results Mean follow-up was 33 months (SD: 17-49 months). Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS at univariate analysis (p=0.29). 10 (18%) patients had a salvage whole-gland treatment after a median follow-up of 26 months (IQR 17-28). RTFS at 2 and 3years were 92% and 80%. Conclusion Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS. NCSC lesion can be left untreated and actively monitored. RTFS was 80% at 3years which support the concept of focal/partial treatment as a treatment option of CSC prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 268
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Focal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound of Unilateral Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Multicentric Hemiablation Study of 111 Patients
    Rischmann, Pascal
    Gelet, Albert
    Riche, Benjamin
    Villers, Arnauld
    Pasticier, Gilles
    Bondil, Pierre
    Jung, Jean-Luc
    Bugel, Hubert
    Petit, Jacques
    Toledano, Harry
    Mallick, Stephane
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Tonoli-Catez, Helene
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (02) : 267 - 273
  • [22] An Exploratory Study of Dose Escalation vs Standard Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treating Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
    Huber, Philipp M.
    Afzal, Naveed
    Arya, Manit
    Boxler, Silvan
    Dudderidge, Tim
    Emberton, Mark
    Guillaumier, Stephanie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Hosking-Jervis, Feargus
    Leemann, Lucas
    Lewi, Henry
    McCartan, Neil
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Nigam, Raj
    Odgen, Chris
    Persad, Raj
    Thalmann, George N.
    Virdi, Jaspal
    Winkler, Mathias
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (06) : 641 - 646
  • [23] Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate after focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Ghafoor, Soleen
    Becker, Anton S.
    Stockerz, Daniel
    Barth, Borna K.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (11) : 3882 - 3895
  • [24] Oncological Outcome and Value of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    Niessen, Christoph
    Rotzinger, Laura
    Reiss, Julian
    Schnabel, Marco J.
    Burger, Maximilian
    Bruendl, Johannes
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [25] Non-Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound vs Whole-Gland High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Management of Localized Prostate Cancer: 1-Year Oncological and Functional Outcomes
    Lei, Ye
    Zanker, Patrick
    Yildiz, Serdar
    Hancke, Kristofina
    Seidl, Daniel
    Koch, Orlando
    Schwentner, Christian
    Mundhenk, Jens
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 100 - 106
  • [26] High-intensity focused ultrasound for treating prostate cancer
    Acher, Peter L.
    Hodgson, Dominic J.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Cahill, Declan J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 99 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [27] High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Review
    Chaussy, Christian G.
    Thueroff, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 : S30 - S37
  • [28] The role of high-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer
    Lynch J.H.
    Loeb S.
    Current Oncology Reports, 2007, 9 (3) : 222 - 225
  • [29] Focal therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: 3-year outcomes from a prospective trial
    Kaufmann, Basil
    Raess, Elisa
    Schmid, Florian A.
    Bieri, Uwe
    Scherer, Thomas P.
    Elleisy, Moustafa
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Moch, Holger
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Eberli, Daniel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (04) : 413 - 424
  • [30] Focal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Targeted Hemiablation for Unilateral Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Evaluation of Oncologic and Functional Outcomes
    Feijoo, Ernesto R. Cordeiro
    Sivaraman, Arjun
    Barret, Eric
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Galiano, Marc
    Rozet, Francois
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Mombet, Annick
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (02) : 214 - 220