DNA extraction methodology for biochar-amended sand and clay

被引:15
作者
Hale, Lauren [1 ]
Crowley, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Environm Sci, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
DNA extraction; Soil; Biochar; Sand; Clay; PowerSoil; Kit-free; REAL-TIME PCR; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; SOIL; ADSORPTION; CARBON; QUANTIFICATION; POLYMERASE; SORPTION; CARRIER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00374-015-1020-5
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Studies on the molecular ecology of microbial communities in soils amended with biochar are potentially biased by changes in soil DNA extraction efficiency caused by DNA adsorption to biochar. To examine the extent to which this might occur, we evaluated a kit-free method for soil DNA extraction as well as MoBio's PowerSoilA (R) commercial kit with and without phenol/chloroform/isoamyl (PCI) modification. DNA extraction efficiencies were quantified for soils amended with four biochar types that were added to either clay or sand soils at a rate of 3 % (w/w). Prior to extraction, all soil treatments were spiked with bacteria transformed with plasmids carrying a green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene, as a molecular marker. DNA purity and yield were assessed spectrophotometrically and fluorometrically. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was utilized to enumerate gfp copy numbers extracted per gram soil. Results showed that qPCR-quality DNA could be efficiently extracted from biochar-amended soils using the PowerSoilA (R) kit with or without PCI modification. However, the modified protocol resulted in an average of approximately 3 times greater yield than the provided protocol. Of the tested methods, none demonstrated reduced DNA extraction efficiency or purity when amended with the varying biochars.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 738
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: Effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR [J].
Ahn, SJ ;
Costa, J ;
Emanuel, JR .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1996, 24 (13) :2623-2625
[2]   Biochar does not affect soil N-transformations or microbial community structure under ruminant urine patches but does alter relative proportions of nitrogen cycling bacteria [J].
Anderson, C. R. ;
Hamonts, K. ;
Clough, T. J. ;
Condron, L. M. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 191 :63-72
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS CORNELL U
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS CORNELL U
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Web Soil Survey
[6]  
[Anonymous], ISME J
[7]  
Bakken LR, 2006, SOIL BIOL, V8, P49
[8]   A review of biochars' potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils [J].
Beesley, Luke ;
Moreno-Jimenez, Eduardo ;
Gomez-Eyles, Jose L. ;
Harris, Eva ;
Robinson, Brett ;
Sizmur, Tom .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2011, 159 (12) :3269-3282
[9]   Green fluorescent protein as a marker for Pseudomonas spp. [J].
Bloemberg, GV ;
OToole, GA ;
Lugtenberg, BJJ ;
Kolter, R .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 63 (11) :4543-4551
[10]   The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments [J].
Bustin, Stephen A. ;
Benes, Vladimir ;
Garson, Jeremy A. ;
Hellemans, Jan ;
Huggett, Jim ;
Kubista, Mikael ;
Mueller, Reinhold ;
Nolan, Tania ;
Pfaffl, Michael W. ;
Shipley, Gregory L. ;
Vandesompele, Jo ;
Wittwer, Carl T. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (04) :611-622