Biomass and central receiver system (CRS) hybridization: Volumetric air CRS and integration of a biomass waste direct burning boiler on steam cycle

被引:27
作者
Coelho, Bruno [1 ]
Schwarzboezl, Peter [2 ]
Oliveira, Armando [1 ]
Mendes, Adelio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, IdMEC Inst Mech Engn, NET New Energy Technol Res Unit, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, D-51147 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, Lab Proc Environm & Energy Engn LEPAE, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
CSP; Central receiver system; Biomass direct burning; Steam cycle integration; Hybridization;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.009
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Concentrated solar power (CSP) plants generate an almost continuous flow of fully dispatchable "renewable" electricity and can replace the present fossil fuel power plants for base load electricity generation. Nevertheless, actual CSP plants have moderate electricity costs, in most cases quite low capacity factors and transient problems due to high inertia. Hybridization can help solve these problems and, if done with the integration of forest waste biomass, the "renewable" goal can be maintained, with positive impact on forest fire reduction. Local conditions, resources and feed in tariffs have great impact on the economical and technical evaluation of hybrid solutions; one of the premium European locations for this type of power plants is the Portuguese Algarve region. Due to the concept innovation level, conservative approaches were considered to be the best solutions. In this perspective, for a lower capital investment 4 MWe power plant scale, the best technical/economical solution is the hybrid CRS/biomass power plant HVIB3S4s with CS3 control strategy. It results in a levelized electricity cost (LEC) of 0.146 (sic)/kWh, with higher efficiency and capacity factor than a conventional 4 MWe CRS. A larger 10 MWe hybrid power plant HVIB3S10s could generate electricity with positive economical indicators (LEC of 0.108 (sic)/kWh and 1RR of 11.0%), with twice the annual efficiency (feedstock to electricity) and lower costs than a conventional 4 MWe CRS. It would also lead to a 17% reduction in biomass consumption (approximately 12,000 tons less per year) when compared with a typical 10 MWe biomass power plant - FRB10; this would be significant in the case of continuous biomass price increase. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2912 / 2922
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONCENTRATING SOLAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MET TYP YEAR FAR
[3]  
Bohn T., 1985, HDB ENERGIE, V5
[4]  
Brown R., 2007, HDB ENERGY EFFICIENC
[5]  
California Energy Commission, 2007, COMP COSTS CAL CENTR
[6]  
CCDR Algarve, 2007, PROT ALG
[7]   Concentrated solar power for renewable electricity and hydrogen production from water-a review [J].
Coelho, B. ;
Oliveira, A. C. ;
Mendes, A. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (10) :1398-1405
[8]  
European Commission, 2005, SOLGATE SOL HYBR BAS
[9]   Regenerative thermal storage in atmospheric air system solar power plants [J].
Fricker, HW .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (5-6) :871-881
[10]  
Ho C.K., 2008, SAND2008805