Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach: Its Application and Development Through the Use of a Table of Specifications Methodology

被引:91
作者
Newman, Isadore [1 ]
Lim, Janine [2 ]
Pineda, Fernanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, 11200 SW 8th St,ZEB 347A, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Andrews Univ, Berrien Springs, MI 49104 USA
关键词
content validity; Table of Specifications; PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1177/1558689813476922
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There is paucity of detailed information in the literature on how to develop procedures for estimating content validity to increase trustworthiness of assessment instruments. The authors present three unique examples, interpretation, and application of Tables of Specifications (ToS) for generating these estimates. The development and logic of the ToS requires presenting evidence that has transparency and creates trustworthiness in the validity estimates by maintaining an audit trail and using of triangulation, expert debriefing, and peer review. The argument presented is that content validity requires a mixed methods approach since data are developed through qualitative and quantitative methods that inform each other. This process is iterative and provides feedback on the effectiveness of the ToS through a process of determining consensus.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 260
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MEASUREMENT EVALUATI
[2]  
Ary D., 2005, INTRO RES ED, V7th
[3]  
Bloom B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, DOI DOI 10.1300/J104V03N01_03
[4]   Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience [J].
Brod, Meryl ;
Tesler, Laura E. ;
Christensen, Torsten L. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (09) :1263-1278
[5]  
Bryant A., 2007, The SAGE handbook of grounded theory, DOI [10.4135/9781848607941, DOI 10.4135/9781848607941]
[6]  
Carmines E.G., 1991, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[7]  
Ceglowski D. A., 2012, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[8]  
Christ T. W., 2012, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[9]   Why have educational evaluators chosen not to do randomized experiments? [J].
Cook, TD .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2003, 589 :114-149
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2003, Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, P209, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781506335193