Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials

被引:91
作者
Kohal, Ralf J. [1 ]
Baechle, Maria [1 ]
Att, Wael [1 ]
Chaar, Saad [1 ]
Altmann, Brigitte [1 ]
Renz, Alexander [2 ]
Butz, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer Inst Mech Mat IWM, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Dental implants; Zirconia; Surface topography; Histomorphometry; Push-in test; Cell-culture study; Rats; OSSEOINTEGRATED FIXTURES; FRACTURE STRENGTH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; GENE-EXPRESSION; EDENTULOUS JAW; SURVIVAL RATE; RAT TIBIA; HFOB; 1.19; IN-VIVO; RABBITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. This study examined the in vitro and in vivo response of osteoblasts to a novel, acid-etched and sandblasted zirconia surface. Methods. Osteoblastic hFOB 1.19 cells were cultured either on electrochemically anodized titanium (TiUnite (R)), machined titanium (Ti-m), sandblasted and acid-etched zirconia (TZP-proc), and machined zirconia (TZP-A-m). The surface topography of the various substrates was analyzed by 3D laserscan measurements and scanning electron microscopy. At culture days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28, cell proliferation was determined. Gene expression was analyzed using RT-PCR. Histologic analysis and biomechanical testing was performed on miniature implants placed in the rat femur. Results. During the first 7 days, a retarded cell proliferation was observed on the TiUnite (R) surface. After 28 days of cultivation, cell proliferation reached similar levels on all surfaces. An up-regulation of bone and extracellular matrix specific genes could be seen for TZP-proc at day 21. The mean bone-implant contact rate after a healing period of 14 and 28 days, respectively, was higher for TiUnite (R) than for TZP-proc. At 28 day, the biomechanical test showed significantly higher values for TiUnite (R) than for all other surfaces. Significance. The novel, rough zirconia surface was accepted by hFOB 1.19 cells and integrates into rat bone tissue. However, osseointegration seemed to proceed more slowly and to a lesser extent compared to a moderately roughened titanium surface. (C) 2013 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 776
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model [J].
Abron, A ;
Hopfensperger, M ;
Thompson, J ;
Cooper, LF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (01) :40-46
[2]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[3]  
ADELL R, 1990, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V5, P347
[4]   Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study [J].
Akagawa, Y ;
Hosokawa, R ;
Sato, Y ;
Kamayama, K .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (05) :551-558
[5]   Fracture Strength of Zirconia Implants after Artificial Aging [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02) :158-166
[6]   Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Wenz, Hans J. ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :32-47
[7]   Influence of a zirconia sandblasting treated surface on peri-implant bone healing: An experimental study in sheep [J].
Bacchelli, Beatrice ;
Giavaresi, Gianluca ;
Franchi, Marco ;
Martini, Desiree ;
De Pasquale, Viviana ;
Trire, Alessandra ;
Fini, Milena ;
Giardino, Roberto ;
Ruggeri, Alessandro .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2009, 5 (06) :2246-2257
[8]  
Baker D, 1999, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V14, P722
[9]  
Bianco PD, 1996, J BIOMED MATER RES, V31, P227
[10]  
Bowers K T, 1992, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V7, P302