Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Malignant Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis on Monotherapy Vs Combination Therapy

被引:5
作者
Pradeep, Jnaneshwari [1 ]
Win, Thin Thin [2 ]
Aye, Saint Nway [2 ]
Sreeramareddy, Chandrashekhar T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Med Univ, Sch Med, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19,Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[2] Int Med Univ, Sch Med, Pathol Dept, 126,Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19,Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
[3] Int Med Univ, Sch Med, Community Med Dept, 126,Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19,Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER | 2022年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
Immune checkpoint inhibitors; advanced malignant melanoma; systematic review; meta; -analysis; monotherapy; combination therapy; COMBINED NIVOLUMAB; IPILIMUMAB; CANCER; SURVIVAL; BLOCKADE; PEMBROLIZUMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.7150/jca.72210
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
<bold>Background</bold>: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved as cancer immunotherapeutic agents for advanced malignant melanoma (MM) in recent years, and nivolumab and ipilimumab are the most widely used ICIs either alone or in combination. However, their efficacy and safety between single and combined ICIs are not clear. This meta-analysis (MA) is aimed to update the efficacy and safety of ICIs by comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in the treatment of advanced MM.<bold>Method</bold>: We searched PubMed, Embase, EbscoHost and ClinicalTrials.gov for the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs between a single ICI and combined ICIs. The outcomes analyzed included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on the study heterogeneity.<bold>Results</bold>: A total of nine RCTs were included in this MA. Regarding the efficacy, combined nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy showed statistically significant prolonged OS and PFS with HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.53, 0.79], p <0.0001 and HR 0.48, 95% CI [0.38, 0.60], p<0.0001 respectively. Combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed statistically significant longer ORR than monotherapy; with RR 2.15, 95% CI [1.63, 2.84], p <0.00001. In terms of safety, the incidence of all AEs which include any AEs, high-grade, haematological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, pulmonary, liver and endocrine AEs were significantly lower with monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) of ICI compared to combination ICI therapy with a p-value <0.00001 to 0.03.<bold>Conclusion</bold>: Efficacy of the combined nivolumab and ipilimumab was better than a single ICI, especially in the treatment of advanced MM. Although combination therapy showed better efficacy than monotherapy, monotherapy (either nivolumab or ipilimumab) was safer than combination therapy as it tended to decrease the incidence of most of the treatment-related AEs.
引用
收藏
页码:3091 / 3102
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Potential Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated With Monotherapy and Combination Therapy of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almutairi, Abdulaali R.
    McBride, Ali
    Slack, Marion
    Erstad, Brian L.
    Abraham, Ivo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [2] Combined immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab with and without local therapy in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a DeCOG* study in 380 patients
    Amaral, Teresa
    Kiecker, Felix
    Schaefer, Sarah
    Stege, Henner
    Kaehler, Katharina
    Terheyden, Patrick
    Gesierich, Anja
    Gutzmer, Ralf
    Haferkamp, Sebastian
    Uttikal, Jochen
    Berking, Carola
    Rafei-Shamsabadi, David
    Reinhardt, Lydia
    Meier, Friedegund
    Karoglan, Ante
    Posch, Christian
    Gambichler, Thilo
    Pfoehler, Claudia
    Thoms, Kai
    Tietze, Julia
    Debus, Dirk
    Herbst, Rudolf
    Emmert, Steffen
    Loquai, Carmen
    Hassel, Jessica C.
    Meiss, Frank
    Tueting, Thomas
    Heinrich, Vanessa
    Eigentler, Thomas
    Garbe, Claus
    Zimmer, Lisa
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [3] Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma
    Amaria, Rodabe N.
    Reddy, Sangeetha M.
    Tawbi, Hussein A.
    Davies, Michael A.
    Ross, Merrick, I
    Glitza, Isabella C.
    Cormier, Janice N.
    Lewis, Carol
    Hwu, Wen-Jen
    Hanna, Ehab
    Diab, Adi
    Wong, Michael K.
    Royal, Richard
    Gross, Neil
    Weber, Randal
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    Ehlers, Richard
    Blando, Jorge
    Milton, Denai R.
    Woodman, Scott
    Kageyama, Robin
    Wells, Daniel K.
    Hwu, Patrick
    Patel, Sapna P.
    Lucci, Anthony
    Hessel, Amy
    Lee, Jeffrey E.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey
    Simpson, Lauren
    Burton, Elizabeth M.
    Posada, Liberty
    Haydu, Lauren
    Wang, Linghua
    Zhang, Shaojun
    Lazar, Alexanderj
    Hudgens, Courtney W.
    Gopalakrishnan, Vancheswaran
    Reuben, Alexandre
    Andrews, Miles C.
    Spencer, Christine N.
    Prieto, Victor
    Sharma, Padmanee
    Allison, James
    Tetzlaff, Michael T.
    Wargo, Jennifer A.
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2018, 24 (11) : 1649 - +
  • [4] Bajwa Ravneet, 2019, J Clin Med Res, V11, P225, DOI 10.14740/jocmr3750
  • [5] Boutron I, 2021, BMJ, V372, pn71. 20
  • [6] CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways Similarities, Differences, and Implications of Their Inhibition
    Buchbinder, Elizabeth I.
    Desai, Anupam
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 39 (01): : 98 - 106
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Jingjie
    Li, Shengnan
    Yao, Qigu
    Du, Nannan
    Fu, Xiaojun
    Lou, Yuanmei
    Wang, Mengru
    Mao, Feiyan
    Mao, Danyi
    Khadaroo, Parikshit Asutosh
    Tang, Yingying
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [8] Churchill R, 2017, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, P21
  • [9] clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01844505 PHASE 3
  • [10] clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03470922 STUDY RE