The impact of R1 resection for colorectal liver metastases on local recurrence and overall survival in the era of modern chemotherapy: An analysis of 1,428 resection areas

被引:23
|
作者
Ardito, Francesco [1 ]
Panettieri, Elena [1 ]
Vellone, Maria [1 ]
Ferrucci, Massimo [1 ]
Coppola, Alessandro [1 ]
Silvestrini, Nicola [1 ]
Arena, Vincenzo [2 ]
Adducci, Enrica [3 ]
Capelli, Giovanni [4 ]
Vecchio, Fabio M. [2 ]
Giovannini, Ivo [1 ]
Nuzzo, Gennaro [1 ]
Giuliante, Felice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Hepatobiliary Surg Unit, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Pathol, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Cassino, Dept Hyg, Cassino, Italy
关键词
HEPATIC RESECTION; MARGIN STATUS; SURGICAL MARGIN; INTRAHEPATIC MICROMETASTASES; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; EXPANDING CRITERIA; PROGNOSTIC IMPACT; CANCER; CARCINOMA; RESECTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It is still unclear whether a positive surgical margin after resection of colorectal liver metastases remains a poor prognostic factor in the era of modern perioperative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative chemotherapy has an impact on reducing local recurrence after R1 resection, and the impact of local recurrence on overall survival. Methods: Between 2000 and 2014, a total of 421 patients underwent resection for colorectal liver metastases at our unit after preoperative chemotherapy. The overall number of analyzed resection areas was 1,428. Results: The local recurrence rate was 12.8%, significantly higher after R1 resection than after RO (24.5% vs 8.7%; P < .001). These results were also confirmed in patients with response to preoperative chemotherapy (23.1% after R1 vs 11.2% after RO; P < .001). At multivariate analysis, R1 resection was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence (P < .001). At the analysis of the 1,428 resection areas, local recurrence significantly decreased according to the increase of the surgical margin width (from 19.1% in 0 mm margin to 2.4% in >= 10 mm). At multivariable logistic regression analysis for overall survival, the presence of local recurrence showed a significant negative impact on 5-year overall survival (P < .001). Conclusion: Surgical margin recurrence after modern preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases was still significantly higher after R1 resection than it was after R0 resection. Local recurrence showed a negative prognostic impact on overall survival. R0 resection should be recommended whenever technically achievable, as well as in patients treated by modern preoperative chemotherapy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 720
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Significance of R1 Resection for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Modern Effective Chemotherapy
    Laurent, Christophe
    Adam, Jean-Philippe
    Denost, Quentin
    Smith, Denis
    Saric, Jean
    Chiche, Laurence
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (05) : 1191 - 1199
  • [2] Outcome of Microscopic Incomplete Resection (R1) of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Ayez, Ninos
    Lalmahomed, Zarina S.
    Eggermont, Alexander M. M.
    Ijzermans, Jan N. M.
    de Jonge, Jeroen
    van Montfort, Kees
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1618 - 1627
  • [3] On-site recurrence risk after parenchymal R1 liver resection for colorectal metastases
    Baron, Thomas
    Laroche, Sophie
    Wagner, Mathilde
    Lim, Chetana
    Renaud, Florence
    Charlotte, Frederic
    Scatton, Olivier
    Goumard, Claire
    SURGERY, 2025, 181
  • [4] Surgery for colorectal liver metastases: the impact of resection margins on recurrence and overall survival
    Angelsen, Jon-Helge
    Horn, Arild
    Eide, Geir Egil
    Viste, Asgaut
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [5] Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival
    Andreou, Andreas
    Knitter, Sebastian
    Schmelzle, Moritz
    Kradolfer, Daniel
    Maurer, Martin H.
    Auer, Timo Alexander
    Fehrenbach, Uli
    Lachenmayer, Anja
    Banz, Vanessa
    Schoning, Wenzel
    Candinas, Daniel
    Pratschke, Johann
    Beldi, Guido
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (05) : 1061 - 1068
  • [6] Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Is an R1 Hepatic Resection Accepted?
    Symeonidis, Dimitrios
    Tepetes, Konstantinos
    Tzovaras, George
    Kissa, Labrini
    Samara, Athina A.
    Bompou, Effrosyni
    Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 12 (06) : 1102 - 1110
  • [7] R1 Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Survey Questioning Surgeons about Its Incidence, Clinical Impact, and Management
    Vigano, Luca
    Costa, Guido
    Cimino, Matteo Maria
    Procopio, Fabio
    Donadon, Matteo
    Del Fabbro, Daniele
    Belghiti, Jacques
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    Torzilli, Guido
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (10) : 1752 - 1763
  • [8] Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with peri-operative chemotherapy: oncological results of R1 resections
    Eveno, Clarisse
    Karoui, Mehdi
    Gayat, Etienne
    Luciani, Alain
    Auriault, Marie-Luce
    Kluger, Michael D.
    Baumgaertner, Isabelle
    Baranes, Laurence
    Laurent, Alexis
    Tayar, Claude
    Azoulay, Daniel
    Cherqui, Daniel
    HPB, 2013, 15 (05) : 359 - 364
  • [9] R1 resection for aggressive or advanced colorectal liver metastases is justified in combination with effective prehepatectomy chemotherapy
    Tanaka, K.
    Nojiri, K.
    Kumamoto, T.
    Takeda, K.
    Endo, I.
    EJSO, 2011, 37 (04): : 336 - 343
  • [10] R1 resection of colorectal liver metastasis - What is the cost of marginal resection?
    Pencovich, Niv
    Houli, Rotem
    Lubezky, Nir
    Goykhman, Yaacov
    Nakache, Richard
    Klausner, Joseph M.
    Nachmany, Ido
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 119 (03) : 347 - 354