From simple receptors to complex multimodal percepts: a first global picture on the mechanisms involved in perceptual binding

被引:5
作者
Velik, Rosemarie [1 ]
机构
[1] Carinthian Tech Res, A-9524 Villach, Austria
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2012年 / 3卷
关键词
perception; binding problem; combination coding; temporal coding; population coding; focus of attention; knowledge; inhibition; FEATURE-INTEGRATION; NEURAL MECHANISMS; VISUAL-CORTEX; REPRESENTATIONS; SYNCHRONIZATION; CONSCIOUSNESS; OSCILLATIONS; FEATURES; OBJECTS; MODELS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00259
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The binding problem in perception is concerned with answering the question how information from millions of sensory receptors, processed by millions of neurons working in parallel, can be merged into a unified percept. Binding in perception reaches from the lowest levels of feature binding up to the levels of multimodal binding of information coming from the different sensor modalities and also from other functional systems. The last 40 years of research have shown that the binding problem cannot be solved easily. Today, it is considered as one of the key questions to brain understanding. To date, various solutions have been suggested to the binding problem including: (1) combination coding, (2) binding by synchrony, (3) population coding, (4) binding by attention, (5) binding by knowledge, expectation, and memory, (6) hardwired vs. on-demand binding, (7) bundling and binding of features, (8) the feature-integration theory of attention, and (9) synchronization through top-down processes. Each of those hypotheses addresses important aspects of binding. However, each of them also suffers from certain weak points and can never give a complete explanation. This article gives a brief overview of the so far suggested solutions of perceptual binding and then shows that those are actually not mutually exclusive but can complement each other. A computationally verified model is presented which shows that, most likely, the different described mechanisms of binding act (1) at different hierarchical levels and (2) in different stages of "perceptual knowledge acquisition." The model furthermore considers and explains a number of inhibitory "filter mechanisms" that suppress the activation of inappropriate or currently irrelevant information.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, International Review on Computers and Software
[2]  
[Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
[3]  
Barlow H B, 1972, Perception, V1, P371, DOI 10.1068/p010371
[4]   Multisensory anatomical pathways [J].
Cappe, C. ;
Rouiller, E. M. ;
Barone, P. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2009, 258 (1-2) :28-36
[5]  
Chun M.M., 2001, BLACKWELL HDB SENSAT, P272
[6]   What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration [J].
Colzato, Lorenza S. ;
Raffone, Antonino ;
Hommel, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2006, 32 (03) :705-716
[7]   Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing [J].
Engel, AK ;
Fries, P ;
Singer, W .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (10) :704-716
[8]   Merging the senses into a robust percept [J].
Ernst, MO ;
Bülthoff, HH .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :162-169
[9]   A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence [J].
Fries, P .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (10) :474-480
[10]   Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention [J].
Fries, P ;
Reynolds, JH ;
Rorie, AE ;
Desimone, R .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5508) :1560-1563