Pathways of organisational transformation for sustainability: a university case-study synthesis presenting competencies for systemic change & rubrics of transformation

被引:6
作者
Baker-Shelley, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Van Zeijl-Rozema, Annemarie [1 ]
Martens, Pim [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst ICIS, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Green Off, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Socio-ecological systems; organis(z)ational transformation; sustainability science; universities; systemic change; organis(z)ational development; POINTS;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2020.1762256
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research article presents a diagnosis and synthesis of three case studies of universities that have transformed themselves as organisations towards sustainability with signature pathway approaches. These took place in 2016 at Leuphana Universitat Luneburg, Arizona State University, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. These universitiesfirstinvested significant time, energy, and human resources in learning about and researching themselves,beforeembarking along differentiated pathways of transformation, in turn, made up of common patterns of rubrics in specific action strategies. The common patterns delineated by the action strategies can be understood as intrinsic competencies for systemic change. These describe the assets of, for example, actors researching, learning about, and diagnosing their own organisations, their awareness of system boundaries and qualities, and the relationship and interdependency between the organisation and its surrounding society and ecosystems. Any blueprint of organisational transformation for sustainability should, therefore, be rooted in the intrinsic logic of the organisations in question. 33 tangible systemic rubrics of transformation also emerged which could be useful for actors (whether student, administrative, academic, entre/intrapreneur, leadership or activist) to prioritise asset development within their organisations, and which might act as pragmatic design aspirations, guiding and encouraging university actors along transformation pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 708
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
LU, 2010, CHRON EV SCI IN SUST
[32]   Learning through evaluation - A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments [J].
Luederitz, Christopher ;
Schaepke, Niko ;
Wiek, Arnim ;
Lang, Daniel J. ;
Bergmann, Matthias ;
Bos, Joannette J. ;
Burch, Sarah ;
Davies, Anna ;
Evans, James ;
Koenig, Ariane ;
Farrelly, Megan A. ;
Forrest, Nigel ;
Frantzeskaki, Niki ;
Gibson, Robert B. ;
Kay, Braden ;
Loorbach, Derk ;
McCormick, Kes ;
Parodi, Oliver ;
Rauschmayer, Felix ;
Schneidewind, Uwe ;
Stauffacher, Michael ;
Stelzer, Franziska ;
Trencher, Gregory ;
Venjakob, Johannes ;
Vergragt, Philip J. ;
von Wehrden, Henrik ;
Westley, Frances R. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 169 :61-76
[33]  
Maedows D., 1999, LEVERAGE POINTS PLAC
[34]  
Mason J., 2012, EXPERT VOICES EARLY, P8
[35]  
Mason M., 2010, P FOR QUAL SOZ FOR Q
[36]  
Nixon-Carter J, 2016, SEMI STRUCTURED INTE
[37]   Tipping Points and the Human World: Living with Change and Thinking about the Future [J].
Nuttall, Mark .
AMBIO, 2012, 41 (01) :96-105
[38]  
PORRAS JI, 1991, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V42, P51
[39]  
President's Office ASU, 2012, AR STAT U AG ENT
[40]  
President's Office ASU, 2015, NEW AM U BOOK TRAIL