Pathways of organisational transformation for sustainability: a university case-study synthesis presenting competencies for systemic change & rubrics of transformation

被引:6
作者
Baker-Shelley, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Van Zeijl-Rozema, Annemarie [1 ]
Martens, Pim [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht Sustainabil Inst ICIS, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Green Off, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Socio-ecological systems; organis(z)ational transformation; sustainability science; universities; systemic change; organis(z)ational development; POINTS;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2020.1762256
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research article presents a diagnosis and synthesis of three case studies of universities that have transformed themselves as organisations towards sustainability with signature pathway approaches. These took place in 2016 at Leuphana Universitat Luneburg, Arizona State University, and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. These universitiesfirstinvested significant time, energy, and human resources in learning about and researching themselves,beforeembarking along differentiated pathways of transformation, in turn, made up of common patterns of rubrics in specific action strategies. The common patterns delineated by the action strategies can be understood as intrinsic competencies for systemic change. These describe the assets of, for example, actors researching, learning about, and diagnosing their own organisations, their awareness of system boundaries and qualities, and the relationship and interdependency between the organisation and its surrounding society and ecosystems. Any blueprint of organisational transformation for sustainability should, therefore, be rooted in the intrinsic logic of the organisations in question. 33 tangible systemic rubrics of transformation also emerged which could be useful for actors (whether student, administrative, academic, entre/intrapreneur, leadership or activist) to prioritise asset development within their organisations, and which might act as pragmatic design aspirations, guiding and encouraging university actors along transformation pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 708
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abson DJ., 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI [10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y]
[2]  
Adomssent M., 2007, INT J SUST HIGHER ED, V8, P385, DOI DOI 10.1108/14676370710823564
[3]  
ASU, 2016, ASU KNOWL ENT DEV
[4]  
ASU, 2013, AR STAT U STRAT ENT
[5]  
ASU, 2004, ONE U MAN PLAC TRANS
[6]  
Baker-Shelley A, 2020, DANCING SHOULDERS GI
[7]   A conceptual synthesis of organisational transformation: How to diagnose, and navigate, pathways for sustainability at universities? [J].
Baker-Shelley, Alex ;
van Zeijl-Rozema, Annemarie ;
Martens, Pim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 145 :262-276
[8]  
Bakhtin MihailMihajlovic., 2006, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays
[9]  
Barth M, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P100
[10]   Hybridizing sustainability: towards a new praxis for the present human predicament [J].
Benessia, Alice ;
Funtowicz, Silvio ;
Bradshaw, Gay ;
Ferri, Francesca ;
Raez-Luna, Ernesto F. ;
Medina, Charito P. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2012, 7 :75-89