IMPAβ: Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis for Bridges

被引:12
作者
Bergami, Alessandro Vittorio [1 ]
Nuti, Camillo [1 ,2 ]
Lavorato, Davide [1 ]
Fiorentino, Gabriele [1 ]
Briseghella, Bruno [2 ]
机构
[1] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Architecture, I-00152 Rome, Italy
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
incremental analysis; nonlinear static (pushover) analysis; modal pushover; nonlinear time-history analysis; bridges; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; DYNAMIC-ANALYSIS; ACCELEROGRAMS;
D O I
10.3390/app10124287
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In the present study, the incremental modal pushover analysis (IMPA), a pushover-based approach already proposed and applied to buildings by the same authors, was revised and proposed for bridges (IMPA beta). Pushover analysis considers the effects of higher modes on the structural response. Bridges are structurally very different from multi-story buildings, where multimodal pushover (MPA) has been developed and is currently used. In bridges, consideration for higher modes is often necessary: The responses of some structural elements of the bridge (e.g., piers) influence the overall bridge response. Therefore, the failure of these elements can determine the failure of the whole structure, even if they give a small contribution total base shear. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) requires input accelerograms for high intensities, which are rare in the databases, while scaling of generated accelerograms with a simple increment of the scaling acceleration is not appropriate. This fact renders IDA, which is by its nature time-consuming, not straightforward. On the contrary, the change of input spectrum required by IMPA is simple. IMPA beta also utilizes a simple complementary method coupled to MPA, to obtain bounds at very high seismic intensities. Finally, the two incremental methods based on static nonlinear and dynamic nonlinear analyses are compared.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FEMA356 ATC, V1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STRUCTURES BUILDINGS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COMPDYN 2017 P 6 INT
[4]   Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure [J].
Antoniou, S ;
Pinho, R .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2004, 8 (05) :643-661
[5]  
ATC, 1996, 40 ATC
[6]  
Aviram A., 2008, UCBPEER200803
[7]   Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building [J].
Bento, R. ;
Bhatt, C. ;
Pinho, R. .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2010, 1 (02) :177-195
[8]   Proposal of a Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) [J].
Bergami, A. V. ;
Forte, A. ;
Lavorato, D. ;
Nuti, C. .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 13 (06) :539-549
[9]   A design procedure of dissipative braces for seismic upgrading structures [J].
Bergami, A. V. ;
Nuti, C. .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2013, 4 (01) :85-108
[10]  
Bergami A.V., 2016, P IT CONCR DAYS ROM