Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery

被引:74
|
作者
Vieira, Marcelo A. [1 ]
Rendon, Gabriel J. [2 ]
Munsell, Mark [3 ]
Echeverri, Lina [2 ]
Frumovitz, Michael [4 ]
Schmeler, Kathleen M. [4 ]
Pareja, Rene [2 ]
Escobar, Pedro F. [4 ]
dos Reis, Ricardo [1 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Barretos Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Barretos, Brazil
[2] Inst Cancerol Las Amer, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
FERTILITY; OUTCOMES; CARCINOMA; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. Radical trachelectomy is considered standard of care in patients with early-stage cervical cancer interested in future fertility. The goal of this study was to compare operative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of patients from four institutions who underwent radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer from June 2002 to July 2013. Perioperative, oncologic, and fertility outcomes were compared between patients undergoing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. Results. A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-eight patients underwent open radical trachelectomy and 42 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS = laparoscopic or robotic). There were no differences in patient age, body mass index, race, histology, lymph vascular space invasion, or stage between the two groups. The median surgical time for MIS was 272 min [range, 130-441 min] compared with 270 min [range, 150-373 min] for open surgery (p = 0.78). Blood loss was significantly lower for MIS vs. laparotomy (50 mL [range, 10-225 mL] vs. 300 mL [50-1100 mL]) (p <0.0001). Nine patients required blood transfusion, all in the open surgery group (p = 0.010). Length of hospitalization was shorter for MIS than for laparotomy (1 day [1-3 days] vs. 4 days [1-9 days]) (p <0.0001). Three intraoperative complications occurred (3%): 1 bladder injury, and 1 fallopian tube injury requiring unilateral salpingectomy in the MIS group and 1 vascular injury in the open surgery group. The median lymph node count was 17 (range, 5-47) for MIS vs. 22 (range, 7-48) for open surgery (p = 0.03). There were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications (30% MIS vs. 31% open surgery). Among 83 patients who preserved their fertility (33 MIS vs. 50 open surgery), 34 (41%) patients attempted to get pregnant. Sixteen (47%) patients were able to do so (MIS: 2 vs. laparotomy: 14, p = 0.01). The pregnancy rate was higher in the open surgery group when compared to the MIS group (51% vs. 28%, p = 0.018). However, median follow-up was shorter is the MIS group compared with the open surgery group (25 months [range, 10-69] vs. 66 months [range, 11-147]). To date, there has been one recurrence in the laparotomy group and none in the MIS group. Conclusions. Our results suggest that radical trachelectomy via MIS results in less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. Fertility rates appear higher in patients undergoing open radical trachelectomy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Park, Jeong-Yeol
    Kim, Dae-Yeon
    Suh, Dae-Shik
    Kim, Jong-Hyeok
    Kim, Yong-Man
    Kim, Young-Tak
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [12] Minimally invasive versus open radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in China
    Chao, Xiaopei
    Li, Lei
    Wu, Ming
    Wu, Huanwen
    Ma, Shuiqing
    Tan, Xianjie
    Zhong, Sen
    Lang, Jinghe
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [13] Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Margul, Daniell J.
    Chen, Ling
    Keating, Nancy L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Yang, Junhua
    Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
    Alexander, Amy
    Barber, Emma L.
    Rice, Laurel W.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Kocherginsky, Masha
    Shahabi, Shohreh
    Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20) : 1905 - 1914
  • [14] The Safety and Effectiveness of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy
    Yoshihara, Kosuke
    Ishiguro, Tatsuya
    Chihara, Makoto
    Shima, Eiri
    Adachi, Sosuke
    Isobe, Masanori
    Haino, Kazufumi
    Yamaguchi, Masayuki
    Sekine, Masayuki
    Kashima, Katsunori
    Takakuwa, Koichi
    Nishikawa, Nobumichi
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (04) : 782 - 787
  • [15] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Case Report and Review of Literature
    Api, Murat
    Boza, Aysen
    Ceyhan, Mehmet
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23 (05) : 677 - 683
  • [16] Minimally invasive surgery and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Yuanyi
    Deng, Ting
    Gu, Shequn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (02) : 255 - 264
  • [17] Radical Trachelectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
    Costales, Anthony
    Michener, Chad
    Escobar-Rodriguez, Pedro F.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (12)
  • [18] Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy
    He, Zuoxi
    Bian, Ce
    Xie, Chuan
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [19] Reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer
    Kim, C. H.
    Abu-Rustum, N. R.
    Chi, D. S.
    Gardner, G. J.
    Leitao, M. M., Jr.
    Carter, J.
    Barakat, R. R.
    Sonoda, Y.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (03) : 585 - 588
  • [20] The oncological and obstetric results of radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing therapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients
    Chen, Tao
    Li, Jia
    Zhu, Yan
    Lu, An-Wei
    Zhou, Li
    Wang, Jian-San
    Zhang, Ying
    Wang, Jun-Tao
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)