The Effect of Dynamic Range Alterations in the Estimation of Contrast

被引:59
作者
Rindal, Ole Marius Hoel [1 ]
Austeng, Andreas [1 ]
Fatemi, Ali [2 ]
Rodriguez-Molares, Alfonso [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Res Grp Digital Signal Proc & Image Anal, Dept Informat, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Adaptive beamforming; Capon's minimum variance; coherence factor; contrast metrics; dynamic range; eigenspace-based minimum variance; filtered-delay multiply and sum; generalized coherence factor; phase coherence factor; PHASE-ABERRATION CORRECTION; MEDICAL ULTRASOUND; COHERENCE; SIGNALS; SPECKLE;
D O I
10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2911267
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Many adaptive beamformers claim to produce images with increased contrast, a feature that could enable a better detection of lesions and anatomical structures. Contrast is often quantified using the contrast ratio (CR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The estimation of CR and CNR can be affected by dynamic range alterations (DRAs), such as those produced by a trivial gray-level transformation. Thus, we can form the hypothesis that contrast improvements from adaptive beamformers can, partly, be due to DRA. In this paper, we confirm this hypothesis. We show evidence on the influence of DRA on the estimation of CR and CNR and on the fact that several methods in the state of the art do alter the DR. To study this phenomenon, we propose a DR test (DRT) to estimate the degree of DRA and we apply it to seven beamforming methods. We show that CR improvements correlate with DRT with R-2-adj = 0.88 in simulated data and R-2-adj = 0.98 in experiments. We also show that DRA may lead to increased CNR values, under some circumstances. These results suggest that claims on lesion detectability, based on CR and CNR values, should be revised.
引用
收藏
页码:1198 / 1208
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   THE IMPROVEMENT AND QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF B-MODE IMAGES PRODUCED BY AN ANNULAR ARRAY CONE HYBRID [J].
PATTERSON, MS ;
FOSTER, FS .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1983, 5 (03) :195-213
[22]   Signal Coherence and Image Amplitude With the Filtered Delay Multiply and Sum Beamformer [J].
Prieur, Fabrice ;
Rindal, Ole Marius Hoel ;
Austeng, Andreas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2018, 65 (07) :1133-1140
[23]  
Rindal O. M. H., 2018, ACHIEVING UNIFORM FI
[24]  
Rindal O.M. H., 2016, Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), P1
[25]  
Rodriguez-Molares Alfonso, 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), DOI 10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8092026
[26]  
Sasso M, 2005, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P489
[27]   Spatial Prediction Filtering of Acoustic Clutter and Random Noise in Medical Ultrasound Imaging [J].
Shin, Junseob ;
Huang, Lianjie .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2017, 36 (02) :396-406
[28]   FREQUENCY INDEPENDENT ULTRASOUND CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS [J].
SMITH, SW ;
LOPEZ, H ;
BODINE, WJ .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1985, 11 (03) :467-477
[29]   LOW CONTRAST DETECTABILITY AND CONTRAST DETAIL ANALYSIS IN MEDICAL ULTRASOUND [J].
SMITH, SW ;
WAGNER, RF ;
SANDRIK, JM ;
LOPEZ, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SONICS AND ULTRASONICS, 1983, 30 (03) :164-173
[30]  
Synnevag JF, 2005, ULTRASON, P1199