Control performance evaluation of semi-active tmd subjected to various types of loads

被引:10
作者
Kim, Hyun-Su [1 ]
Chang, Chunho [2 ]
Kang, Joo-Won [3 ]
机构
[1] Sunmoon Univ, Div Architecture Architectural & Civil Engn, Asan, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Daegu, South Korea
[3] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Architecture, Gyongsan, South Korea
关键词
semi-active tuned mass damper; vibration control; groundhook; mr damper; hybrid control device; TUNED MASS DAMPERS; OF-THE-ART; STRUCTURAL CONTROL; VIBRATION CONTROL; EXCITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13296-015-9006-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many types of tuned mass dampers (TMDs), such as active TMDs, multiple TMDs, hybrid TMDs, semi-active TMDs etc., have been proposed to effectively reduce the dynamic responses of a structure. Control performance of a conventional TMD subjected to various types of dynamic loads has been widely studied to date. Although it is known that control performance of a semi-active TMD is better than that of a conventional TMD, control performance of a semi-active TMD subjected to various types of dynamic loads has not been fully studied. Therefore, control performance of a semi-active TMD has been systematically evaluated in this study. To this end, an idealized variable damping device and a magnetorheological (MR) damper are used as semi-active dampers. These semi-active dampers can change the properties of TMDs in real time based on the dynamic responses of a structure. The control performance of STMD is investigated with respect to various types of excitation by numerical simulation. Groundhook control algorithm is used to appropriately modulate the damping force of semi-active dampers. The control effectiveness between STMD and a conventional passive TMD, both under harmonic and random excitations, is evaluated and compared for a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structure. Excitations are applied to the structure as a dynamic force and ground motion, respectively. The numerical studies showed that the control effectiveness of STMD is significantly superior to that of the passive TMD, regardless of the type of excitations.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 594
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS AND SOME DESIGN FORMULAS [J].
ABE, M ;
FUJINO, Y .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1994, 23 (08) :813-835
[2]   Simple ATMD control methodology for tall buildings subject to wind loads [J].
Ankireddi, S ;
Yang, HTY .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1996, 122 (01) :83-91
[3]  
CHANG JCH, 1980, J ENG MECH DIV-ASCE, V106, P1091
[4]   Adaptive vibration control by a variable-damping dynamic absorber using ER fluid [J].
Hidaka, S ;
Ahn, YK ;
Morishita, S .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (03) :373-378
[5]   SEMI-ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE OR ACTIVE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR STRUCTURAL CONTROL [J].
HROVAT, D ;
BARAK, P ;
RABINS, M .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1983, 109 (03) :691-705
[6]   Semiactive control strategies for MR dampers: Comparative study [J].
Jansen, LM ;
Dyke, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2000, 126 (08) :795-803
[7]   VIBRATION CONTROL USING SEMIACTIVE FORCE GENERATORS [J].
KARNOPP, D ;
CROSBY, MJ ;
HARWOOD, RA .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1974, 96 (02) :619-626
[8]   Semi-active fuzzy control of a wind-excited tall building using multi-objective genetic algorithm [J].
Kim, Hyun-Su ;
Kang, Joo-Won .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2012, 41 :242-257
[9]   Experimental robustness analysis of magneto-rheological tuned vibration absorbers subject to mass off-tuning [J].
Koo, JH ;
Ahmadian, M ;
Setareh, M .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 128 (01) :126-131
[10]  
Li CX, 2000, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V29, P1405, DOI 10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1405::AID-EQE976>3.0.CO