Is There an Allegiance Effect for Assessment Instruments? Actuarial Risk Assessment as an Exemplar

被引:46
作者
Blair, Pamela R.
Marcus, David K. [1 ]
Boccaccini, Marcus T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Psychol, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
[2] Sam Houston State Univ, Houston, TX USA
关键词
allegiance effect; meta-analysis; risk assessment; SORAG; Static-99; VRAG;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00147.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1993), the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (Quinsey, Harris, Rice, & Cormier, 1998), and the Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 1999) are three well-researched risk measures. All three instruments were good predictors of recidivism (r = .31). However, these effect sizes were significantly larger in studies conducted by the instruments' authors (r = .37) than in studies conducted by independent researchers (r = .28). This allegiance effect remained significant even when the initial validation studies were excluded. No other design or sample characteristics were significant moderators of the relation between scores and recidivism. These findings raise questions about whether such an allegiance effect may be found for other measures.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 360
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Prediction of the risk of male sexual reoffending in Australia [J].
Allan, A ;
Dawson, D ;
Allan, MM .
AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (01) :60-68
[2]  
Andrews D.A., 1995, LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised
[3]  
[Anonymous], PS3120042EPDF PUBL W
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, VIOLENT OFFENDERS AP
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PSYCHOPATHY CHECKLIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Legal and Criminological Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1348/135532502760274756
[7]  
[Anonymous], MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[8]   A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists [J].
Archer, Robert P. ;
Buffington-Vollum, Jacqueline K. ;
Stredny, Rebecca Vauter ;
Handel, Richard W. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 87 (01) :84-94
[9]   Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders [J].
Barbaree, HE ;
Seto, MC ;
Langton, CM ;
Peacock, EJ .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2001, 28 (04) :490-521
[10]   Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type [J].
Bartosh, DL ;
Garby, T ;
Lewis, D ;
Gray, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2003, 47 (04) :422-438