Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom

BackgroundVariations in radiation dose between various X-ray systems have received limited study. ObjectiveWe examined the impact of X-ray system type on patient radiation dose during cardiac catheterization. MethodsAn anthropomorphic phantom was used in a series of standardized experiments that involved 15 sec of continuous cineangiography in 7 projections. Three to seven experiments were performed in four commonly used X-ray systems: Innova IGS (GE Healthcare), Integris Allura FD20 (Philips), Allura Clarity (Philips), and Artis one (Siemens). Phantom radiation dose was measured with a dedicated X-ray dosimetry system (Gafchromic radiology film and Film QA XR software, Ashland) that was precalibrated at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 Gray, and with the X-ray system built-in functions. ResultsRadiation dose was lowest with the Allura Clarity system [average film dose 4.20.1 cGray, peak film dose 18.3 +/- 1.6 cGray, Air Kerma (AK) dose 0.310 +/- 0.002 Gray, Dose Area Product (DAP) dose 23.72 +/- 0.84 Gray*cm(2)], intermediate with the Integris Allura FD20 (average film dose 4.4 +/- 1.1 cGray, peak film dose 29.4 +/- 15.5 cGray, AK 0.482 +/- 0.189 Gray, DAP 45.18 +/- 21.90 Gray*cm(2)), and highest with the Artis one system (average film dose 7.4 +/- 0.8 cGray, peak film dose 66.9 +/- 0.09 cGray, AK 0.746 +/- 0.085 Gray, DAP 75.93 +/- 9.11 Gray*cm(2)) and the Innova IGS system (average film dose 7.2 +/- 1.0 cGray, peak film dose 49.3 +/- 28.9 cGray, AK 0.874 +/- 0.340 Gray, DAP 92.28 +/- 14.73 Gray*cm(2); P=0.011 for average film dose, P=0.019 for maximum film dose, P=0.033 for AK, and P=0.008 for DAP). ConclusionsThe X-ray system type has significant impact on patient radiation dose during cardiac catheterization. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.