Motor Nerve Conduction Tests in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

被引:7
作者
Kasius, Kristel M. [1 ,2 ]
Claes, Franka [1 ,3 ]
Verhagen, Wim I. M. [1 ]
Meulstee, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Neurol & Clin Neurophysiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] OLVG West, Dept Neurol & Clin Neurophysiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Franciscus Vlietland Hosp, Dept Neurol, Schiedam, Netherlands
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
carpal tunnel syndrome; nerve conduction studies; diagnostics; sensory nerve action potentials; motor nerve conduction tests; TERMINAL LATENCY INDEX; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2019.00149
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: For the preoperatively often required confirmation of clinically defined carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), sensory as well as motor nerve conduction studies can be applied. The aim of this study was to test the sensitivity of specific motor nerve conduction tests in comparison with, as well as in addition to, sensory nerve conduction tests. Methods: In 162 patients with clinically defined CTS, sensory and motor nerve conduction tests were performed prospectively. Sensitivity and specificity of all tests were computed. Also, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted. Results: Sensitivity for all sensory tests was at least 79.4% (DIG1). All tests had a specificity of at least 95.7%. The motor conduction test with the highest sensitivity was the TLI-APB (81.3%); its specificity was 97.9%. Conclusion: In the electrophysiological confirmation of CTS, sensory nerve conduction tests and terminal latency index have a high sensitivity. If, however, sensory nerve action potentials cannot be recorded, all motor nerve conduction tests have a high sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Comparison of motor conduction techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
    Chang, MH
    Wei, SJ
    Chiang, HL
    Wang, HM
    Hsieh, PF
    Huang, SY
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (11) : 1603 - 1607
  • [2] The Real Role of Forearm Mixed Nerve Conduction Velocity in the Assessment of Proximal Forearm Conduction Slowing in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    Chang, Ming-Hong
    Lee, Yee-Chung
    Hsieh, Peiyuan F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (06) : 373 - 377
  • [3] Current practice in the use of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome by surgeons in the Netherlands
    Claes, F.
    Verhagen, W. I. M.
    Meulstee, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2007, 32E (06) : 663 - 667
  • [4] Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome - Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Jablecki, CK
    Andary, MT
    Floeter, MK
    Miller, RG
    Quartly, CA
    Vennix, MJ
    Wilson, JR
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (11) : 1589 - 1592
  • [5] JABLECKI CK, 1993, MUSCLE NERVE, V16, P1392
  • [6] An easily applicable alternative method for warming cold limbs in nerve conduction studies
    Kasius, K. M.
    Riphagen, J. H.
    Verhagen, W. I. M.
    Meulstee, J.
    [J]. NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 44 (02): : 219 - 226
  • [7] The segmental palmar test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome reassessed
    Kasius, Kristel M.
    Claes, Franka
    Verhagen, Wim I. M.
    Meulstee, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (11) : 2291 - 2295
  • [8] The anatomy of the recurrent branch of the median nerve
    Kozin, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 23A (05): : 852 - 858
  • [9] CARPAL-TUNNEL-SYNDROME IN 100 PATIENTS - SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY OF MULTI-NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES AND ESTIMATION OF AXONAL LOSS OF MOTOR, SENSORY AND SYMPATHETIC MEDIAN NERVE-FIBERS
    KUNTZER, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 127 (02) : 221 - 229
  • [10] Incidence of common compressive neuropathies in primary care
    Latinovic, R
    Gulliford, MC
    Hughes, RAC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 77 (02) : 263 - 265