Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial

被引:34
作者
Buckner, Julia D. [1 ]
Zvolensky, Michael J. [2 ,3 ]
Ecker, Anthony H. [4 ,5 ]
Schmidt, Norman B. [6 ]
Lewis, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Paulus, Daniel J. [2 ]
Lopez-Gamundi, Paula [7 ]
Crapanzano, Kathleen A. [8 ]
Bakhshaie, Jafar [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] South Cent Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[7] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
Cannabis; Marijuana; Anxiety disorders; Dual diagnosis; Integrated treatment; MARIJUANA USE MOTIVES; SOCIAL ANXIETY; ELIMINATION THERAPY; PANIC-ATTACKS; RELIABILITY; DEPENDENCE; PREVALENCE; REACTIVITY; VALIDITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2018.10.014
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is the most common illicit substance use disorder and individuals with CUD have high rates of comorbid anxiety disorders. Comorbidity between CUD and anxiety disorders is of public health relevance given that although motivation enhancement therapy (MET) combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for CUD, outcomes are worse for patients with elevated anxiety. The current study tested the acceptability and efficacy of the integration of a transdiagnostic anxiety CBT (i.e., treatment of patients with any anxiety disorder) with MET-CBT (integrated cannabis and anxiety reduction treatment, or ICART) for CUD compared to MET-CBT alone. Treatment-seeking cannabis users (56.4% male, M-age = 23.2, 63.3% non-Hispanic White) with CUD and at least one comorbid anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to ICART (n = 27) or MET-CBT (n = 28). Patients in the ICART condition attended significantly more treatment sessions than those in the MET-CBT condition. Patients in the ICART condition were more likely to be abstinent post-treatment than those in MET-CBT. Further, treatment produced decreases in cannabis use and related problems. Notably, therapy type did not moderate the impact of treatment on frequency of use and related problems. Together, these data suggest that ICART may be at least as efficacious as a gold-standard psychosocial CUD treatment, MET-CBT, for a difficult-to-treat subpopulation of cannabis users.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, R: A language for environment for statistical computing
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, CLIN EVALUATION MEDI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-004-1_5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DOI 10.1176/dsm10.1176/appi.books.9780890420249.dsm-iv-tr
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DETAILED ENG DESIGN
[6]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING ALCOHOL CO, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3
[7]  
[Anonymous], SUBSTANCE ABUSE MENT
[8]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIC PLAN
[9]   Brief treatments for cannabis dependence: Findings from a randomized multisite trial [J].
Babor, TF ;
Carroll, K ;
Christiansen, K ;
Donaldson, J ;
Herrell, J ;
Kadden, R ;
Litt, M ;
McRee, B ;
Miller, M ;
Roffman, R ;
Solowij, N ;
Steinberg, K ;
Stephens, R ;
Vendetti, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 72 (03) :455-466
[10]  
Berry Donald A, 2006, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P30, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj006