Slip-corrected liquid permeability and its effect on hydraulic fracturing and fluid loss in shale

被引:150
作者
Javadpour, F. [1 ]
McClure, M. [2 ]
Naraghi, M. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Bur Econ Geol, Austin, TX 78713 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Petr & Geosyst Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Apparent liquid permeability; Nanopore; Atomic force microscope; Stochastic permeability; SEM image; GAS-FLOW; APPARENT PERMEABILITY; MUDROCKS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.017
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Pore diameter in shale strata ranges from a few to hundreds of nanometers, whereas in conventional reservoirs the range is 3 orders of magnitude greater. In spite of the small size of the pores-which would be expected to cause very low intrinsic permeability-field reports document unusually high loss of hydraulic fracturing fluid (as much as 90%) in shale reservoirs. The lost fluid remains in induced fractures and also leaks off into the shale matrix. Liquid flow in tiny pores is different from the flow in large pores. To compensate for this difference, the traditional liquid flow model needs a correction parameter called liquid slip length. We measured slip length of brine and pores in shale by using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Our measurements suggest a slip length of 250 nm in organic pores. We used measured slip length in a stochastic permeability model to calculate apparent liquid permeability (ALP) in the shale matrix. When corrected for slip length, the ALP in shale can be much greater than intrinsic Darcy permeability. We then used ALP in a coupled flow-geomechanical simulator to study the effects of slip-corrected matrix permeability on the induced fracture network and fluid loss during hydraulic fracturing. The results show the dramatic effects of the slip parameter on the fracture network and explain the high fluid loss during hydraulic fracturing. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 559
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]   Nonempirical Apparent Permeability of Shale [J].
Singh, H. ;
Javadpour, F. ;
Ettehadtavakkol, A. ;
Darabi, H. .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2014, 17 (03) :414-424
[42]   DRAINAGE OF A THIN LIQUID-FILM CONFINED BETWEEN HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES [J].
VINOGRADOVA, OI .
LANGMUIR, 1995, 11 (06) :2213-2220
[43]   Oil adsorption in shale nanopores and its effect on recoverable oil-in-place [J].
Wang, Sen ;
Feng, Qihong ;
Javadpour, Farzam ;
Xia, Tian ;
Li, Zhen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2015, 147 :9-24
[44]   Progress toward a stochastic rock mechanics model of engineered geothermal systems [J].
WillisRichards, J ;
Watanabe, K ;
Takahashi, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1996, 101 (B8) :17481-17496
[45]   VALIDITY OF CUBIC LAW FOR FLUID-FLOW IN A DEFORMABLE ROCK FRACTURE [J].
WITHERSPOON, PA ;
WANG, JSY ;
IWAI, K ;
GALE, JE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (06) :1016-1024