Fuel poverty and rebound effect in South Korea: An estimation for home appliances using the modified regression model

被引:5
作者
Jin, Sang-Hyeon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Publ Adm, 80 Daehakro, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Res Inst Publ Affairs, 80 Daehakro, Daegu 41566, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Fuel poverty; rebound effect; backfire effect; direct estimation; concavity; super conservation; LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; THERMAL COMFORT; CONSUMPTION; POLICY; IMPACT; RESIDENTS; RETROFIT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1177/0958305X19877529
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Since the occurrence of oil shocks in the 1970s, a number of countries have introduced fuel poverty programs. However, rebound effects could be problematic even in these programs. In particular, there are two controversies surrounding rebound effects: the magnitude of rebound effects and the influence of income on these effects. This study attempts to resolve these issues by empirically estimating the rebound effects of individual home appliances for low-income households. Thereafter, it compares the rebound effects for low-income families with those for all-income families. Analyses results suggest that the magnitude of rebound effects highly depends on individual home appliances, and that these effects are usually larger for low-income households. Thus, the differences in rebound effects between all-income and low-income households also depend on individual appliances. Therefore, policy-makers should meticulously consider the rebound effects of individual home appliances when planning energy efficiency programs.
引用
收藏
页码:1147 / 1166
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Agency for International Development (US AID), 2007, P WORKSH IMPR EL SER
[2]  
[Anonymous], REV FUEL POV LOW INC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ENERGY J
[4]   Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters [J].
Bird, Stephen ;
Hernandez, Diana .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 :506-514
[5]   Prices, technology development and the rebound effect [J].
Birol, F ;
Keppler, JH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :457-469
[6]   Energy efficiency fallacies revisited [J].
Brookes, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :355-366
[7]   Rebound effect: how much to worry? [J].
Chakravarty, Debalina ;
Dasgupta, Shyamasree ;
Roy, Joyashree .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (02) :216-228
[8]   Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States [J].
Chen, Chien-fei ;
Xu, Xiaojing ;
Day, Julia K. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 26 :61-71
[9]   Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups [J].
Chitnis, Mona ;
Sorrell, Steve ;
Druckman, Angela ;
Firth, Steven K. ;
Jackson, Tim .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 106 :12-32
[10]   Domestic energy efficiency in Ireland: correcting market failure [J].
Clinch, JP ;
Healy, JD .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (01) :1-8