A kinematic algorithm to identify gait events during running at different speeds and with different footstrike types

被引:34
作者
Handsaker, Joe C. [1 ,2 ]
Forrester, Stephanie E. [3 ]
Folland, Jonathan P. [1 ]
Black, Matt I. [1 ]
Allen, Sam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Sch Sport Exercise & Hlth Sci, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] MAS Innovat, Colombo, Sri Lanka
[3] Univ Loughborough, Wolfson Sch Mech Elect & Mfg Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
Ground contact time; Touchdown; Toe-off; TOE-OFF; TREADMILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.013
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Although a number of algorithms exist for estimating ground contact events (GCEs) from kinematic data during running, they are typically only applicable to heelstrike running, or have only been evaluated at a single running speed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of four kinematics-based algorithms to estimate GCEs over a range of running speeds and footstrike types. Subjects ran over a force platform at a range of speeds; kinetic and kinematic data was captured at 1000 Hz, and kinematic data was downsampled to 250 Hz. A windowing process initially identified reduced time windows containing touchdown and toe-off. Algorithms based on acceleration and jerk signals of the foot markers were used to estimate touchdown (2 algorithms), toe-off (2 algorithms), and ground contact time (GCT) (4 algorithms), and compared to synchronous 'gold standard' force platform data. An algorithm utilising the vertical acceleration peak of either the heel or first metatarsal marker (whichever appeared first) for touchdown, and the vertical jerk peak of the hallux marker for toe-off, resulted in the lowest offsets (+3.1 ms, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -11.8 to +18.1 ms; and +2.1 ms, CI: -8.1 to +12.2 ms respectively). This method also resulted in the smallest offset in GCT (-1.1 ms, CI: -18.6 to +16.4 ms). Offsets in GCE and GCT estimates from all algorithms were typically negatively correlated to running speed, with offsets decreasing as speed increased. Assessing GCEs and GCT using this method may be useful when a force platform is unavailable or impractical. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4128 / 4133
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners [J].
Altman, Allison R. ;
Davis, Irene S. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2012, 35 (02) :298-300
[2]   Comparison of Five Kinematic-Based Identification Methods of Foot Contact Events During Treadmill Walking and Running at Different Speeds [J].
Alvim, Felipe ;
Cerqueira, Lucenildo ;
Netto, Aluizio D'Affonseca ;
Leite, Guilherme ;
Muniz, Adriane .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 31 (05) :383-388
[3]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[4]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[5]   Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data [J].
De Witt, John K. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 43 (15) :3067-3069
[6]   Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running [J].
Fellin, Rebecca E. ;
Rose, William C. ;
Royer, Todd D. ;
Davis, Irene S. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2010, 13 (06) :646-650
[7]   The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle - A curve-clustering approach [J].
Forrester, S. E. ;
Townend, J. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 41 (01) :26-32
[8]   A simple method for determination of gait events [J].
Hansen, AH ;
Childress, DS ;
Meier, MR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (01) :135-138
[9]   Phase determination during normal running using kinematic data [J].
Hreljac, A ;
Stergiou, N .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2000, 38 (05) :503-506
[10]   Identifying gait events without a force plate during running: A comparison of methods [J].
Leitch, Jessica ;
Stebbins, Julie ;
Paolini, Gabriele ;
Zavatsky, Amy B. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2011, 33 (01) :130-132