Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures

被引:17
|
作者
Raviraj, A. [2 ]
Anand, Ashish [1 ,2 ]
Chakravarthy, Murali [2 ]
Pai, Sanjay [2 ]
机构
[1] St Catherines Med Ctr, Ashland, PA USA
[2] Fortis Hosp Ltd, Dept Orthoped Surg, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Trochanteric fractures; Osteoporotic; Intramedullary nails; Femoral fractures; Hip fractures; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; GAMMA-NAIL; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; PERITROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; FIXATION; FAILURE; CUTOUT;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-011-0840-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Unstable trochanteric fractures have been an enigma for the orthopedic surgeon in the community because of unpredictable results. Cephalic intramedullary nails with proximal antirotation device are the treatment of choice for such patients. To report outcomes of 36 consecutive patients treated with a proximal femoral nail (PFNA) for osteoporotic trochanteric femoral fractures. The patients included 20 men and 16 women, aged 55-78 years (mean 65.3 years) years with trochanteric/proximal femoral fractures, which underwent PFNA fixation using an intramedullary nail and a spiral blade into the femoral head. We used AO system of classification of the fractures. Pertrochanteric (31 A1 and 31 A2), intertrochanteric fractures (31 A3), and high subtrochanteric (32 A1) fractures were included in the study. We had 16 A2 fractures, 12 A3 fractures, and 6 A1 fractures and 2 cases of 32 A1 fractures. 31 A2 was the commonest type. The operative time, the overall fluoroscopy time, intraoperative blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, and the surgical complications were noted. Patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months (range 18-36 months). Functional outcomes were assessed according to the Harris hip scoring system. One patient required open reduction. The mean duration of surgery was 45 min (range 25-55 min). The mean image intensifier usage time was 70 ms with a range between 44 and 98 ms. The mean time of hospital stays was 5 days (4-10). Postoperative radiographs showed good reduction in 32 cases (out of 34) or acceptable in the 2 cases. There were three postoperative complications (one myocardial infarction, one patient developed DVT, and one patient developed bedsore). There were no cutouts of the spiral blade. Two patients expired due to medical illness unrelated to the fracture. All 34 patients available for follow-up had healed fractures without any implant-related complications, such as bending, breaking, or implant cutout. The average bone healing time was 18 weeks (12-22 weeks). At the time of the latest follow-up, all the 34 patients were full weight bearing on affected site, with return to their preinjury activity level. The mean Harris hip score was 96.4 points (range 69-100 points). A total of 32 patients had excellent or good outcome, and 2 patients had satisfactory outcome and none had poor outcome. PFNA is useful for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures, and our initial experience suggest that it has low implant-related complications.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 305
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures
    A. Raviraj
    Ashish Anand
    Murali Chakravarthy
    Sanjay Pai
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2012, 22 : 301 - 305
  • [2] The Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
    Kristek, Dalibor
    Lovric, Ivan
    Kristek, Jozo
    Biljan, Marta
    Kristek, Gordana
    Sakic, Kata
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 (03) : 937 - 940
  • [3] The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): A new design for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures
    Mereddy, Praveen
    Kamath, Sri
    Ramakrishnan, Muthukrishnan
    Malik, Hamad
    Donnachie, Nigel
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2009, 40 (04): : 428 - 432
  • [4] Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation
    Guo, Jialiang
    Dong, Weichong
    Jin, Lin
    Yin, Yingchao
    Zhang, Ruipeng
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Yingze
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (09) : 4333 - 4343
  • [5] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus Gamma nail in treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures
    Yan, Denglu
    Soon, Yancheng
    Lv, Yuming
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2012, 23 (04): : 346 - 350
  • [6] Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures with the PFNA (Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation) Nail System Report of Early Results
    Takigami, Iori
    Matsumoto, Kazu
    Ohara, Akira
    Yamanaka, Kazuteru
    Naganawa, Toshitaka
    Ohashi, Minoru
    Date, Kazuto
    Shimizu, Katsuji
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2008, 66 (04): : 276 - 279
  • [7] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Yanfeng Huang
    Chunlin Zhang
    Yi Luo
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 2465 - 2473
  • [8] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [9] Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Sahin, Suner
    Erturer, Erden
    Ozturk, Irfan
    Toker, Serdar
    Seckin, Faik
    Akman, Senol
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2010, 44 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [10] Functional and Radiological Results of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fractures
    Radaideh, Ahmad M.
    Qudah, Hashem A.
    Audat, Ziad A.
    Jahmani, Rami A.
    Yousef, Ibraheem R.
    Saleh, Abed Allah A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (04)