Combined feedback linearization and constrained model predictive control for entry flight

被引:116
作者
van Soest, WR [1 ]
Chu, QP [1 ]
Mulder, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2629 HS Delft, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2514/1.14511
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The advantages of constrained model predictive control over proportional integral derivative (PID) control applied to a feedback-linearized entry flight-control problem are discussed. The feedback linearization is based on the full rotational equations of motion rather than on a conventional model derived from time-scale separation. Input and state constraints are applied to avoid input saturations, to guarantee a minimum level of tracking performance,and to avoid physical vehicle state constraints violation. A constraint mapping algorithm is developed to map the input and state constraints on the new inputs after feedback linearization. The performance of the constrained model predictive control design is compared with that of two PID control designs. Simulation of a complete entry flight demonstrates the advantages of the constrained model predictive control design, because control surfaces do not saturate, control actions are more smooth and efficient, no gain scheduling is required, and all performance requirements are satisfied.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 434
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   FLIGHT CONTROL DESIGN USING NON-LINEAR INVERSE DYNAMICS [J].
LANE, SH ;
STENGEL, RF .
AUTOMATICA, 1988, 24 (04) :471-483
[12]   Entry guidance and trajectory control for reusable launch vehicle [J].
Lu, P .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1997, 20 (01) :143-149
[13]   Entry guidance for the X-33 vehicle [J].
Lu, P ;
Hanson, JM .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1998, 35 (03) :342-349
[14]   NONLINEAR PREDICTIVE CONTROLLERS FOR CONTINUOUS SYSTEMS [J].
LU, P .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1994, 17 (03) :553-560
[15]   Feasibility and stability of constrained finite receding horizon control [J].
Primbs, JA ;
Nevistic, V .
AUTOMATICA, 2000, 36 (07) :965-971
[16]   Flight control design using robust dynamic inversion and time-scale separation [J].
Reiner, J ;
Balas, GJ ;
Garrard, WL .
AUTOMATICA, 1996, 32 (11) :1493-1504
[17]  
SHEARER CM, 1998, AIAA GUID NAV CONTR, P772
[18]   NONLINEAR PREDICTIVE CONTROL OF FEEDBACK LINEARIZABLE SYSTEMS AND FLIGHT CONTROL-SYSTEM DESIGN [J].
SINGH, SN ;
STEINBERG, M ;
DIGIROLAMO, RD .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1995, 18 (05) :1023-1028
[19]   NONLINEAR INVERSION FLIGHT CONTROL FOR A SUPERMANEUVERABLE AIRCRAFT [J].
SNELL, SA ;
ENNS, DF ;
GARRARD, WL .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1992, 15 (04) :976-984
[20]   Comparison of intelligent, adaptive, and nonlinear flight control laws [J].
Steinberg, ML .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2001, 24 (04) :693-699