A Mixed-Methods Outcomes Evaluation Protocol for a Co-Produced Psychoeducation Workshop Series on Recovery from Psychosis

被引:0
作者
Lee, Ying Ying [1 ]
Koo, Wei Ler [1 ]
Tan, Yi Fong [1 ]
Seet, Vanessa [1 ]
Subramaniam, Mythily [1 ,2 ]
Ang, Suying [3 ]
Tang, Charmaine [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Mental Hlth, Res Div, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Inst Mental Hlth, Early Psychosis Intervent Programme, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
co-production; recovery college; outcome evaluation; implementation; mental health; psychosis; MENTAL-ILLNESS; COPRODUCTION;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192315464
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-production in mental health is a relatively new approach to designing and delivering mental health services, which involves collaboration amongst professionals, persons in recovery, and their caregivers to provide services. The aim of this protocol paper is to detail the implementation and evaluation of a co-produced workshop series named Broken Crayons. Collaborating with an early intervention program for first-episode psychosis, the study team and peer volunteers generated a co-production framework based on their experience of co-producing 11 workshops. This paper also outlines a protocol to evaluate Broken Crayons, a psychoeducation workshop series co-created and co-delivered by mental health professionals, persons in recovery, and their caregivers. Indicators on personal recovery, mental wellbeing, community integration, etc., are included as outcomes. Two-tailed, paired t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-workshop survey data. Focus group discussions will also be conducted to gather subjective experiences of participants of the Broken Crayons workshops. Cost-savings of co-production by Recovery Colleges are discussed. The implications of using co-production to foster citizenry in persons living with first-episode psychosis are discussed in the context of social causation and social drift theories. Taken together, we argued that co-production is not just a passing trend, but a moral imperative for inclusive and equitable mental health service design and delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Recovery Colleges
[3]  
[Anonymous], IBM RELEASE NOTES IB, P23
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Core Values, Ethics, Spectrum - The 3 Pillars of Public Participation-International Association for Public Participation
[5]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[6]   An evaluation of service use outcomes in a Recovery College [J].
Bourne, Philippa ;
Meddings, Sara ;
Whittington, Adrian .
JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 27 (04) :359-366
[7]  
Boyle D., The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services
[8]  
Cahn E.S., 2000, NO MORE THROW AWAY P, P212
[9]   Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? [J].
Castleberry, Ashley ;
Nolen, Amanda .
CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2018, 10 (06) :807-815
[10]   Co-production in mental health care [J].
Clark, Michael .
MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (04) :213-219