A political ecology of green territorialization: frontier expansion and conservation in the Colombian Amazon

被引:10
作者
Hein, Jonas [1 ,5 ]
Del Cairo, Carlos [2 ]
Ortiz Gallego, Daniel [2 ,4 ]
Vergara Gutierrez, Tomas [2 ]
Sebastian Velez, Juan [3 ,4 ]
de Francisco, Jean Carlo Rodriguez [5 ]
机构
[1] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Dept Geog, Ludewig Meyn Str 14, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[2] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Dept Antropol, Carrera 5 39-00 Edificio 95 Manuel Briceno, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Inst Dev Policy IOB, Lange St Annastr 7, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Ctr Alternat Dev Cealdes, Bogota, Colombia
[5] Deutsch Inst Entwicklungspolit DIE, German Dev Inst, Tulpenfeld 6, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
来源
ERDE | 2020年 / 151卷 / 01期
关键词
territorialization; land tenure; REDD; Colombia; Vision Amazonia; conservation; post-conflict; green growth; PROPERTY; FOREST; TERRITORIES; FRAMEWORK; INDONESIA; VIOLENCE; JUSTICE; RIGHTS; PEACE; LAND;
D O I
10.12854/erde-2020-456
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
After decades of civil war, the Colombian government has recently declared the Amazon as a model region for green growth and low carbon development. The Amazon Vision programme, launched by the Colombian government in 2016, seeks to contribute to forest conservation, climate mitigation, poverty reduction and peace building. The Amazon Vision fundamentally reframes the Colombian Amazon from a 'narco frontier' that needs to be liberated from guerrilla influence, organized crime and peasants destroying forests for coca cultivation, to a net CO2 sink with enormous potential for green growth and poverty reduction. Drawing on historical and empirical qualitative research in Guaviare and complemented by a quantitative land cover classification, this article builds on the concept of green territoriality' to investigate the extent to which the shift towards conservation affects property rights and the ability of indigenous groups and peasants to access land and natural resources. We illustrate how the reframing of peasants from protagonists of development and frontier expansion to villains, and of indigenous communities from 'underdeveloped' forest dwellers to environmental guardians, has created land conflicts and affected the legitimacy of their respective property rights. In both cases, the Amazon Vision strengthens conservation policies and challenges existing land rights but also creates new windows of opportunity for the land claims of indigenous communities while reinforcing conceptualizations of social differentiation among dwellers of the Amazon.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 57
页数:21
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Agnew J, 2013, SPACES OF CONTENTION: SPATIALITIES AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, P121
[2]  
Agrawal A., 2009, Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options, P201, DOI DOI 10.17528/CIFOR/002871
[3]  
Alagappa Muthiah., 1995, Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia
[4]  
García HA, 2011, TEX LAW REV, V89, P1895
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FRONTIERS BORDERLAND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1984, FRONTIER EXPANSION A
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts
[8]  
Arendt H., 1968, ORIGINS TOTALITARIAN
[9]   A political ecology of REDD plus : Property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River [J].
Asiyanbi, Adeniyi P. .
GEOFORUM, 2016, 77 :146-156
[10]   Narco-frontiers: A spatial framework for drug-fuelled accumulation [J].
Ballve, Teo .
JOURNAL OF AGRARIAN CHANGE, 2019, 19 (02) :211-224