Shaking table tests on precast reinforced concrete and engineered cementitious composite/reinforced concrete composite frames

被引:19
|
作者
Xu, Li [1 ]
Pan, Jinlong [1 ]
Leung, C. K. Y. [2 ]
Yin, Wanyun [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] China MCC17 Grp Co Ltd, Maanshan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
composite frame; engineered cementitious composite; precast; reinforced concrete; seismic performance; shaking table test; MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES; PINNED CONNECTIONS; SEISMIC TESTS; BEHAVIOR; MEMBERS; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1177/1369433217733759
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Engineered cementitious composite is an advanced composite material with strain-hardening and multiple cracking behavior. Substituting conventional concrete with engineered cementitious composite can significantly improve the seismic performance of reinforced concrete structures. This article presents the seismic behavior of a precast engineered cementitious composite/reinforced concrete composite frame and a precast reinforced concrete frame. In the precast engineered cementitious composite/reinforced concrete composite frame, engineered cementitious composite is used to replace concrete in the beam-to-column joints and the bottom columns. The shaking table test results on the two scaled frames are presented. The frame failure characteristics and dynamic properties, including the fundamental frequency, story displacement, inter-story drift, and story acceleration, are comprehensively studied. The test results indicate that the connection method adopted in the tested frames is applicable and reliable. Both of the frames have good seismic performance and can withstand earthquakes at the design seismic intensity. Using engineered cementitious composite in precast frames can greatly reduce damage. The precast engineered cementitious composite/reinforced concrete composite frame has better deformation capacity, better energy dissipation ability, and slower stiffness deterioration than the precast reinforced concrete frame.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 837
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shaking Table Tests on a Building with Brick- and Reinforced-Concrete Walls
    Beyer, K.
    Tondelli, M.
    Petry, S.
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2013, 88 : S2 - S7
  • [42] Shaking table tests of reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections
    Benavent-Climent, A
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2005, 34 (15): : 1833 - 1839
  • [43] APPLICATION OF IDENTIFICATION METHODOLOGY TO SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON REINFORCED-CONCRETE COLUMNS
    LU, XL
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1995, 17 (07) : 505 - 511
  • [44] Seismic analysis on reinforced concrete group silos through shaking table tests
    Xu, Qikeng
    Zhang, Hao
    Liu, Qiang
    Wang, Lumin
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2021, 22 (03) : 1285 - 1296
  • [45] Shaking table tests on a retrofitted, small scale, reinforced concrete model building
    Dritsos, SE
    Vandoros, KG
    Taylor, CA
    SEISMIC DESIGN PRACTICE INTO THE NEXT CENTURY: RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 1998, : 525 - 533
  • [46] Seismic Strengthening of Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames with Composite Materials
    Ozden, Sevket
    Akguzel, Umut
    Ozturan, Turan
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2011, 108 (04) : 414 - 422
  • [47] CONTINUOUS CONNECTIONS FOR PRECAST REINFORCED-CONCRETE FRAMES
    PICARD, A
    LEGER, P
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1980, 7 (01) : 144 - 155
  • [48] COMPOSITE REINFORCED-CONCRETE
    TAYLOR, R
    CONCRETE, 1976, 10 (08): : 23 - 25
  • [49] Effect of Fiber Type and Volume Fraction on Fiber Reinforced Concrete and Engineered Cementitious Composite Mechanical Properties
    Abd Elmoaty, Abd Elmoaty M.
    Morsy, Alaa M.
    Harraz, Abdelrhman B.
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [50] Experimental Study on Seismic Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Precast Concrete Panels
    Baran, Mehmet
    Tankut, Tugrul
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2011, 108 (02) : 227 - 237