Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean

被引:4
作者
Mierau, Allyson [1 ]
Kurtenbach, Moria E. [1 ]
Johnson, Eric N. [1 ]
Gulden, Robert H. [2 ]
Weber, Jessica D. [3 ]
May, William E. [4 ]
Willenborg, Christian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Plant Sci, Coll Agr & Bioresources, 51 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Plant Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[3] Western Appl Res Corp, Scott, SK, Canada
[4] Agr & Agrifood Canada, Regina, SK, Canada
关键词
Glyphosate resistance; herbicide layering; soybean; volunteer canola; VOLUNTEER CANOLA; TRITICUM-AESTIVUM; YIELD LOSS; ZEA-MAYS; L; DEGRADATION; PERSISTENCE; DICAMBA; COTTON; 2,4-D;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2020.2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) canola is a widely grown crop across western Canada and has quickly become a prolific volunteer weed. Glyphosate-resistant soybean is rapidly gaining acreage in western Canada. Thus, there is a need to evaluate herbicide options to manage volunteer GR canola in GR soybean crops. We conducted an experiment to evaluate the efficacy of various PRE and POST herbicides applied sequentially to volunteer GR canola and to evaluate soybean injury caused by these herbicides. Trials were conducted across Saskatchewan and Manitoba in 2014 and 2015. All treatments provided a range of suppression (>70%) to control (>80%) of volunteer canola. All treatments with the exception of the glyphosate-treated control reduced aboveground canola biomass by an average of 96%. As well, canola seed contamination was reduced from 36% to less than 5% when a PRE and POST herbicide were both used. Moreover, all combinations of herbicides used had excellent crop safety (<10%). All PRE and POST herbicide combinations provided better control of volunteer canola compared with the glyphosate-only control, but tribenuron followed by bentazon and tribenuron followed by imazamox plus bentazon provided solutions that were low cost, currently available (registered in western Canada), and had the potential to minimize development of herbicide resistance in other weeds.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, DIRITTO E STORIA RIV, V10, P1, DOI DOI 10./0471142735.im0710s94
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, SAS STAT 13 2 USERS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, CAN CLIM NORM 1981 2
  • [4] Beckie H, 2014, INT SURVEY HERBICIDE
  • [5] Beckie H. J., 2007, CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, V2, DOI 10.1079/PAVSNNR20072044
  • [6] Beckie HJ, 2010, P NAT M CAN WEED SCI
  • [7] Beckie HJ, 2015, CAN J PLANT SCI, V95, P345, DOI [10.4141/CJPS-2014-328, 10.4141/cjps-2014-328]
  • [8] Bowley S.R., 2015, HITCHHIKERS GUIDE ST
  • [9] Byker HP, 2013, CAN J PLANT SCI, V93, P659, DOI [10.4141/cjps2012-320, 10.4141/CJPS2012-320]
  • [10] Canadian Weed Science Society, 2018, DESCR 0 100 RAT SCAL