Forensic DNA phenotyping: Developing a model privacy impact assessment

被引：18

作者：

Scudder, Nathan ^{[1
,3
]}

McNevin, Dennis ^{[1
]}

Kelty, Sally F. ^{[2
]}

Walsh, Simon J. ^{[3
]}

Robertson, James ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Canberra, Natl Ctr Forens Studies, Fac Sci & Technol, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia

[2] Univ Canberra, Fac Hlth, Ctr Appl Psychol, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia

[3] Australian Fed Police, GPO Box 401, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

来源：

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS | 2018年 / 34卷

关键词：

Forensic; DNA phenotyping; Biogeographical ancestry; Externally visible characteristics; Privacy; Privacy impact assessment; GENETIC PRIVACY; PREDICTION; LINKAGE; TRAIT; RISK;

D O I：

10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.03.005

中图分类号：

Q3 [遗传学];

学科分类号：

071007 ; 090102 ;

摘要：

Forensic scientists around the world are adopting new technology platforms capable of efficiently analysing a larger proportion of the human genome. Undertaking this analysis could provide significant operational benefits, particularly in giving investigators more information about the donor of genetic material, a particularly useful investigative lead. Such information could include predicting externally visible characteristics such as eye and hair colour, as well as biogeographical ancestry. This article looks at the adoption of this new technology from a privacy perspective, using this to inform and critique the application of a Privacy Impact Assessment to this emerging technology. Noting the benefits and limitations, the article develops a number of themes that would influence a model Privacy Impact Assessment as a contextual framework for forensic laboratories and law enforcement agencies considering implementing forensic DNA phenotyping for operational use.

引用

页码：222 / 230

页数：9

共 61 条

[1] Anderson N., 2009, ANONYMIZED DATA REAL
[2] Genetic privacy needs a more nuanced approach
Angrist, Misha
[J]. NATURE, 2013, 494 (7435) : 7 - 7
[3] World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
[J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20): : 2191 - 2194
[4] [Anonymous], 2009, RIGHTS
[5] Australian Law Reform Commission, 2003, 96 AUSTR LAW REF COM
[6] Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics
Borsting, Claus
Morling, Niels
[J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2015, 18 : 78 - 89
[7] Forensic genetics and ethical, legal and social implications beyond the clinic
Cho, MK
Sankar, P
[J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2004, 36 (11) : S8 - S12
[8] Clarke Roger, 2009, Computer Law and Security Report, V25, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.02.002
[9] Culnane C., 2016, CANBERRA TIMES 1205
[10] Curtis C., 2014, TECHNOL SOC, V34, P21

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →