PROMIS Physical Function for prediction of postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:27
|
作者
Patel, Dil, V [1 ]
Bawa, Mundeep S. [1 ]
Haws, Brittany E. [1 ]
Khechen, Benjamin [1 ]
Block, Andrew M. [1 ]
Karmarkar, Sailee S. [1 ]
Lamoutte, Eric H. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; Physical Function; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; patient-reported outcomes; pain scores; narcotics consumption; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; CAT INSTRUMENTS; SPINE SURGERY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18863
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if the preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Physical Function (PROMIS PF) score is predictive of immediate postoperative patient pain and narcotics consumption or long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent primary, single-level MIS TLIF for degenerative pathology were identified and grouped by their preoperative PROMIS PF scores: mild disability (score 40-50), moderate disability (score 30-39.9), and severe disability (score 20-29.9). Postoperative pain was quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS), and narcotics consumption was quantified using Oral Morphine Equivalents. PROMIS PF, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and VAS back and leg pain were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Preoperative PROMIS PF subgroups were tested for an association with demographic and perioperative characteristics using 1-way ANOVA or chi-square analysis. Preoperative PROMIS PF subgroups were tested for an association with immediate postoperative pain and narcotics consumption in addition to improvements in PROMIS PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and VAS back and leg pain by using linear regression controlling for statistically different demographic characteristics. RESULTS A total of 130 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped by their preoperative PROMIS PF scores: 15.4% had mild disability, 63.8% had moderate disability, and 20.8% had severe disability. There were no significant differences among the subgroups in terms of age, sex, smoking status, and comorbidity burden. Patients with greater disability were more likely to be obese and to have workers' compensation insurance. There were no differences among subgroups in regard to operative levels, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay. Patients with greater disability reported higher VAS pain scores and narcotics consumption for postoperative day 0 and postoperative day 1. Patients with greater preoperative disability demonstrated lower PROMIS PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and worse VAS pain scores at each postoperative time point. CONCLUSIONS Patients with worse preoperative disability, as assessed by PROMIS PF, experienced increased pain and narcotics consumption, along with less improvement in long-term PROs. The authors conclude that PROMIS PF is an efficient and accurate instrument that can quickly assess patient disability in the preoperative period and predict both short-term and long-term surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 482
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multimodal Analgesia Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures
    Singh, Kern
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Kim, Tae D.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Buvanendran, Asokumar
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (15) : 1145 - 1150
  • [42] Lumbar alignment and patient-reported outcomes after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with and without local coronal imbalance
    Pan, Wei
    Zhao, Jia-li
    Xu, Jin
    Zhang, Ming
    Fang, Tao
    Yan, Jing
    Wang, Xin-hong
    Zhou, Quan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 34 (03) : 464 - 470
  • [43] Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Yee, Timothy. J.
    Lau, Darryl
    Khan, Adam A.
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (06) : 644 - 652
  • [44] Higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Does Not Limit Safety or Improvement Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2022, 19 (03) : 533 - 543
  • [45] Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Chan, Alvin Y.
    Lien, Brian V.
    Choi, Elliot H.
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Hanna, George
    Lopez, Alexander M.
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Gattas, Sandra
    Kirillova, Lydia
    Horton, David
    Fote, Gianna
    Hanst, Brian
    Perry, Ryan
    Lee, Yu-Po
    Golshani, Kiarash
    Hsu, Frank P. K.
    Oh, Michael Y.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 49 (03) : 1 - 6
  • [46] Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes
    Mooney, James
    Michalopoulos, Giorgos D.
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Zeitouni, Daniel
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Sherrod, Brandon A.
    Haid, Regis W.
    Knightly, John J.
    Devin, Clinton J.
    Pennicooke, Brenton
    Asher, Anthony L.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (05) : 753 - 766
  • [47] Are the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal/Posterior Lumbar Fusion Influenced by the Patient's Age or BMI?
    Manson, Neil
    Hubbe, Ulrich
    Pereira, Paulo
    Lam, Khai
    Fuster, Salvador
    Senker, Wolfgang
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (07): : 284 - 291
  • [48] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database for Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Guan, Jian
    Bisson, Erica F.
    Dailey, Andrew T.
    Hood, Robert S.
    Schmidt, Meic H.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (07) : E416 - E421
  • [49] Psychometric Comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT With the FAAM and FFI for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Hung, Man
    Baumhauer, Judith F.
    Brodsky, James W.
    Cheng, Christine
    Ellis, Scott J.
    Franklin, Jeremy D.
    Hon, Shirley D.
    Ishikawa, Susan N.
    Latt, L. Daniel
    Phisitkul, Phinit
    Saltzman, Charles L.
    SooHoo, Nelson F.
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (06) : 592 - 599
  • [50] Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Omolabake O. Oyetayo
    James W. Nie
    Timothy J. Hartman
    Keith R. MacGregor
    Eileen Zheng
    Fatima N. Anwar
    Andrea M. Roca
    Vincent P. Federico
    Dustin H. Massel
    Gregory D. Lopez
    Arash J. Sayari
    Kern Singh
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2023, 165 : 3531 - 3537