PROMIS Physical Function for prediction of postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

被引:26
|
作者
Patel, Dil, V [1 ]
Bawa, Mundeep S. [1 ]
Haws, Brittany E. [1 ]
Khechen, Benjamin [1 ]
Block, Andrew M. [1 ]
Karmarkar, Sailee S. [1 ]
Lamoutte, Eric H. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; Physical Function; minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; patient-reported outcomes; pain scores; narcotics consumption; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; CAT INSTRUMENTS; SPINE SURGERY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18863
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if the preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Physical Function (PROMIS PF) score is predictive of immediate postoperative patient pain and narcotics consumption or long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent primary, single-level MIS TLIF for degenerative pathology were identified and grouped by their preoperative PROMIS PF scores: mild disability (score 40-50), moderate disability (score 30-39.9), and severe disability (score 20-29.9). Postoperative pain was quantified using the visual analog scale (VAS), and narcotics consumption was quantified using Oral Morphine Equivalents. PROMIS PF, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), and VAS back and leg pain were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. Preoperative PROMIS PF subgroups were tested for an association with demographic and perioperative characteristics using 1-way ANOVA or chi-square analysis. Preoperative PROMIS PF subgroups were tested for an association with immediate postoperative pain and narcotics consumption in addition to improvements in PROMIS PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and VAS back and leg pain by using linear regression controlling for statistically different demographic characteristics. RESULTS A total of 130 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped by their preoperative PROMIS PF scores: 15.4% had mild disability, 63.8% had moderate disability, and 20.8% had severe disability. There were no significant differences among the subgroups in terms of age, sex, smoking status, and comorbidity burden. Patients with greater disability were more likely to be obese and to have workers' compensation insurance. There were no differences among subgroups in regard to operative levels, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay. Patients with greater disability reported higher VAS pain scores and narcotics consumption for postoperative day 0 and postoperative day 1. Patients with greater preoperative disability demonstrated lower PROMIS PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and worse VAS pain scores at each postoperative time point. CONCLUSIONS Patients with worse preoperative disability, as assessed by PROMIS PF, experienced increased pain and narcotics consumption, along with less improvement in long-term PROs. The authors conclude that PROMIS PF is an efficient and accurate instrument that can quickly assess patient disability in the preoperative period and predict both short-term and long-term surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 482
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Park, Chun-Kun
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2019, 59 (06) : 222 - 230
  • [42] Surgeon and patient radiation exposure in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Bindal, Rajesh K.
    Glaze, Sharon
    Ognoskie, Meghann
    Tunner, Van
    Malone, Robert
    Ghosh, Subrata
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (06) : 570 - 573
  • [43] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [44] Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases
    Honggang Wang
    Yue Zhou
    Zhengfeng Zhang
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 1595 - 1600
  • [45] Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases
    Wang, Honggang
    Zhou, Yue
    Zhang, Zhengfeng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (05) : 1595 - 1600
  • [46] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation
    Lee, Yunsoo
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    McCurdy, Michael A.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Fras, Sebastian I.
    Purtill, William
    Millar, Ben
    Kolowrat, Samantha
    Issa, Tariq Z.
    D'Antonio, Nicholas D.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Kaye, Ian David
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1078 - 1084
  • [47] Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study
    Lawless, Michael H.
    Claus, Chad F.
    Tong, Doris
    Jordan, Noah
    Dosanjh, Amarpal
    Hanson, Connor T.
    Carr, Daniel A.
    Houseman, Clifford M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [48] Postoperative Outcomes Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yoo, Joon S.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Brundage, Thomas S.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (01): : E40 - E42
  • [49] Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive surgery during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Heary, Robert F.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) : 413 - 414
  • [50] Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lee, Kong Hwee
    Yue, Wai Mun
    Yeo, William
    Soeharno, Henry
    Tan, Seang Beng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (11) : 2265 - 2270